From f3a05384216c999d3078220064f51ad27a851081 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Margaret O'Brien Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:14:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] checking for logical consistency section a few more words, to be clearer. --- docs/eml-semantic-annotations-primer.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/eml-semantic-annotations-primer.md b/docs/eml-semantic-annotations-primer.md index f8ada720..3456e5f8 100644 --- a/docs/eml-semantic-annotations-primer.md +++ b/docs/eml-semantic-annotations-primer.md @@ -423,8 +423,8 @@ Things to check: 1. Be sure you have used the right classes, properties, or vocabularies for your annotation components 1. Become familiar with the vocabularies in your annotation, especially definitions and relationships - 1. Check with your community for specific recommendations on annotations at different levels -1. In `additionalMetadata`, don't combine `annotations` with more than one `describes` element. EML allows 1:many `describes` elements in one `additionalMetadata` section. So if you have 2 `describes` and 2 `annotations`, you will have 4 RDF statements. Make sure they are all true, and if not, break them up. + 1. Check with your community for specific recommendations on the best vocabularies to use for annotations at different levels +1. In `additionalMetadata`, don't combine `annotations` with more than one `describes` element. EML allows 1:many `describes` elements in a single `additionalMetadata` section. So if you have 2 `describes` and 2 `annotations`, you will have 4 RDF statements. Make sure they are all true, and if not, break them up into multiple `additionalMetadata` sections.