Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

document use of ORCID ids in userId field #260

Closed
mbjones opened this issue Mar 12, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

document use of ORCID ids in userId field #260

mbjones opened this issue Mar 12, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@mbjones
Copy link
Member

@mbjones mbjones commented Mar 12, 2017


Author Name: Matt Jones (Matt Jones)
Original Redmine Issue: 6574, https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/6574
Original Date: 2014-07-03
Original Assignee: Matt Jones


Kyle Braak [GBIF] has requested that we document how to use ORCID ids in EML documentation. He writes:

Just a thought, but to promote ORCIDs a bit, how about adding http://orcid.org/ to the list of examples in the "directory" documentation: https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/#external//emlparser/docs/eml-2.1.1/./eml-party.html#directory? Another candidate could be Researcher IDs (e.g. http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-4862-2011).

This includes describing the use of the http://orcid.org site as the directory, and showing an example of an ORCID in the text. We should also mak eit clear that a userId from a public source like ORCID is much more useful than a local userid from a site-specific system.

@mbjones mbjones added this to the EML2.2.0 milestone Mar 12, 2017
@mbjones mbjones added this to TODO in EML 2.2.0 Release Mar 12, 2017
@mbjones mbjones added bug and removed Status: New labels Mar 12, 2017
@mbjones mbjones moved this from TODO to High priority in EML 2.2.0 Release Apr 22, 2017
@mbjones mbjones moved this from High priority to In progress in EML 2.2.0 Release Jul 17, 2017
@mbjones
Copy link
Member Author

@mbjones mbjones commented Jul 17, 2017

Added userid documentation in the 2.2 branch, merged from @amoeba . This is closed and ready for review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants