documentation for eml_project incorrectly asserts that there must be a personnel with role "originator"

[emilyodean]

The "personnel" subsection of the eml-project documentation states that "A project must have at least one originator." This is inconsistent with the actual validation of the EML, which does require that each personnel have a "role" but does not require one of those personnel's roles to be "originator."

[mbjones]

Thanks, @emilyodean. Good catch on the language. We need a way to state that each project must have at least one personnel, but that is awkward language wise. I'll think about what the edit should be, but am open to suggestions.

[amoeba]

Why not just:

The Personnel field extends ResponsibleParty with role information and is used to document people involved in a research project by providing contact information and their role in the project. A project must have at least one originator.

[mbjones]

That sounds good. Changes committed to 2.2 branch. Please review, otherwise this will go out with the 2.2. release.

[amoeba]

LGTM, thanks! Please close if that was enough of a review.

[mbjones]

I'll leave it open in the review state for a bit to see if others in the EML community have comments. If not, then I'll close it as we prep for release. Thanks.

[mobb]

my only comment is that this change looks fine. I agree, the original wording was awkward.