Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fitness code requires equal amount of order parameters from simulations and experiments #64

ohsOllila opened this issue May 2, 2019 · 1 comment


None yet
2 participants
Copy link

commented May 2, 2019

Currently the fitness code
requires an equal amount of order parameters in simulation and experimental data.

However, in some cases, all the order parameters cannot be calculated due to overlapping atom names (see issue #9). In addition, we may have cases in the future where only part of order parameters are known experimentally.

It would be useful to be able to run the fitness code despite of the incomplete order parameter dataset.


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented May 5, 2019

Equal amounts of data are needed because the fitness function doesn't make sense unless every simulated value has an experimental counterpart.

However, I have now provided another version of the script where this is not explicitly tested ( The code skips OPs that are not present in the file containing OP calculation output. Note that you have to manually remove the corresponding value from the experimental results since they only have an ambiguous number indicator in the format I was given.

Same applies is an experimental OP is missing: remove it from the list of simulated ones.

It is a bit messy but with the experimental format what it is, this was the only workaround I could think of.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.