-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 390
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Addressed Documentation Issues - April-August 2016 #6463
Conversation
@Myoldmopar I am not able to trace the reason for Ubuntu build failure. Can you please check and let me know? Thanks. |
@Myoldmopar I cannot see the build failure problem locally. Can you please try to kick off Linux build and let me know which one is the offending equation? |
@Nigusse I found the build problem. When running LaTeX locally, I found the
Look at l.2404 in that snippet. In the theta = 90 part, you open up math mode using I pushed up a fix for one of them, but I actually just noticed the second one there. Looks to be the same problem. I'll push that one up also. |
Alright, if those fix the Ubuntu error then this can merge in. |
@Myoldmopar Thank you for fixing the building problem. |
Oh come on it's still there. Ugh...rebuilding locally. |
@Nigusse OK, now they should all be cleaned. A full build of all doc files touched on this branch reveals no more instances of "LaTeX Error" in the compiler output. One thing that I think may have caused this is some confusion about braces. In LaTeX, escaping parentheses is actually invoking math mode, so you can easily write inline math:
But if you are already inside math mode, it will cause a failure, so:
To be clear, I like to use single dollar signs for entering inline math mode:
Now, all that said, please take a look at my last commit for two reasons.
Thanks though, these look good now and this will make another good set of cleanup on the docs and input files. If CI is happy on Linux, I'll merge it. |
@Myoldmopar Just check documentation in a local build. The equation for the curve Curve:ExponentialSkewNormal, in output reference on page 2270 is incorrect. It should have been Z2 = [(exp(C3x) * C4x) - C1] / C2, instead of C3, C4 was entered is used. |
Gah, OK. I will make an issue to resolve after IO freeze so it doesn't add to CI burden now. Thanks for finding it. |
OK, new issue made #6476; carry on. |
Closed via #6494 |
Issue #5603
Pull request overview
Documentation update and Idd changes. Below are the list of changes:
Checklist
Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.
Review Checklist