Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
83 lines (64 loc) · 2.97 KB

MI-R1.3-649848907b-MODEL.md

File metadata and controls

83 lines (64 loc) · 2.97 KB

TITLE: FAIR Maturity Indicator MI-R1.3-649848907b-MODEL

Authors:

Ammar Ammar, ORCID:0000-0002-8399-8990

Publication Date: 2021-02-12

Last Edit: 2024-04-13

Accepted: pending

Maturity Indicator Identifier: MI-R1.3-649848907b-MODEL

This maturity indicator falls under the FAIR principle R1.3: (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards

The ID of this MI is composed of the following segments (separated by hyphen):

  1. Acronym for "Maturity Indicator"
  2. The FAIR principle this maturity indicator belongs to
  3. The first 10 characters truncated from the SHA-256 hash of the primary reference DOI of this maturity indicator.
  4. A short name to distinguish the maturity indicator definition file

This MI is to indicate if the model used to compute the zeta-potential is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Maturity Indicator Name: The model used to compute the zeta-potential is reported by the nano toxicity study

This maturity indicator is extracted from the following paper Title: Guidance to improve the scientific value of zeta potential measurements in nanoEHS DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EN00136J

To which principle does it apply?

R1.3

What is being measured?

If the model used to compute the zeta-potential is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Why should we measure it?

The zeta-potential is a modeled value. Without knowing the model used to calculate it, the EPM (Electrophoretic mobility) cannot be determined, and comparisons between different studies cannot be made with confidence.

What must be provided for the measurement?

If the value is measured and reported in the data, the following field(s) should appear in JSON-LD metadata:

Field Name
model

How is the measurement executed?

The model used to compute the zeta-potential should be provided in a machine-readable format (JSON-LD) which can be queried using open universal protocol like HTTP.

What is/are considered valid result(s)?

The presence of the field "model" in the JSON-LD metadata means the measurement is reported which is the valid result.

For which digital resource(s) is this relevant? (or 'all')

For nano toxicity related datasets.

Examples of good practices (that would score well on this assessment)

{
 	"@context": {
 		"bs": "https://bioschemas.org/",
 		"schema": "https://schema.org/",
 		"citation": "schema:citation",
 		"name": "schema:name",
 		"url": "schema:url",
 		"variableMeasured": "schema:variableMeasured",
 		"unitText": "schema:unitText"
 	},
 	"@type": "schema:Dataset",
 	"name": "Dataset title",
 	"@id": "Dataset DOI",
 	"url": "Dataset URL",
 	"citation": "Dataset Citation/Publication",
 	"variableMeasured": [
 		{
 			"@type": "schema:PropertyValue",
 			"name": "model"
 		}
 	]
 }

Comments