Skip to content
Permalink
main
Switch branches/tags
Go to file
 
 
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time

TITLE: FAIR Maturity Indicator MI-R1.3-649848907b-NM_SURFACE_FUNCTIONALIZATION

Authors:

Ammar Ammar, ORCID:0000-0002-8399-8990

Publication Date: 2021-02-12

Last Edit: 2021-05-03

Accepted: pending

Maturity Indicator Identifier: MI-R1.3-649848907b-NM_SURFACE_FUNCTIONALIZATION

This maturity indicator falls under the FAIR principle R1.3: (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards

The ID of this MI is composed of the following segments (separated by hyphen):

  1. Acronym for "Maturity Indicator"
  2. The FAIR principle this maturity indicator belongs to
  3. The first 10 characters truncated from the SHA-256 hash of the primary reference DOI of this maturity indicator.
  4. A short name to distinguish the maturity indicator definition file

This MI is to indicate if "Surface functionalization" of the nanomaterial(s) is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Maturity Indicator Name: The surface functionalization is reported by the nano toxicity study

This maturity indicator is extracted from the following paper Title: Guidance to improve the scientific value of zeta potential measurements in nanoEHS DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EN00136J

To which principle does it apply?

R1.3

What is being measured?

If the surface functionalization is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Why should we measure it?

The appropriate model for calculating the zeta-potential depends on particle size (through κa) and potentially on shape for the smallest particles. The presence of a macromolecular coating on the particle, or a shell, or any charged (small molecule) ligands can affect the electrophoretic mobility and hence zeta-potential.

What must be provided for the measurement?

If the value is measured and reported in the data, the following field(s) should appear in JSON-LD metadata:

Field Name Alternative terms
surface functionalization surface_functionalization,
surface_functionalization,
SurfaceFunctionalization

How is the measurement executed?

The surface functionalization should be provided in a machine-readable format (JSON-LD) which can be queried using open universal protocol like HTTP.

What is/are considered valid result(s)?

The presence of the field "surface functionalization" in the JSON-LD metadata means the measurement is reported which is the valid result.

For which digital resource(s) is this relevant? (or 'all')

For nano toxicity related datasets.

Examples of good practices (that would score well on this assessment)

{
 	"@context": {
 		"bs": "https://bioschemas.org/",
 		"schema": "https://schema.org/",
 		"citation": "schema:citation",
 		"name": "schema:name",
 		"url": "schema:url",
 		"variableMeasured": "schema:variableMeasured",
 		"unitText": "schema:unitText"
 	},
 	"@type": "schema:Dataset",
 	"name": "Dataset title",
 	"@id": "Dataset DOI",
 	"url": "Dataset URL",
 	"citation": "Dataset Citation/Publication",
 	"variableMeasured": [
 		{
 			"@type": "schema:PropertyValue",
 			"name": "surface functionalization"
 		}
 	]
 }

Comments