Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
85 lines (66 loc) · 3.34 KB

MI-R1.3-faf3eea67a-PCHEM_AGGLOMERATE_SIZE.md

File metadata and controls

85 lines (66 loc) · 3.34 KB

TITLE: FAIR Maturity Indicator MI-R1.3-faf3eea67a-PCHEM_AGGLOMERATE_SIZE

Authors:

Ammar Ammar, ORCID:0000-0002-8399-8990

Publication Date: 2021-03-16

Last Edit: 2024-04-13

Accepted: pending

Maturity Indicator Identifier: MI-R1.3-faf3eea67a-PCHEM_AGGLOMERATE_SIZE

This maturity indicator falls under the FAIR principle R1.3: (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards

The ID of this MI is composed of the following segments (separated by hyphen):

  1. Acronym for "Maturity Indicator"
  2. The FAIR principle this maturity indicator belongs to
  3. The first 10 characters truncated from the SHA-256 hash of the primary reference DOI of this maturity indicator.
  4. A short name to distinguish the maturity indicator definition file

This MI is to indicate if "Agglomerate size" is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Maturity Indicator Name: The agglomerate size is reported by the nano toxicity study

This maturity indicator is extracted from the following paper Title: Minimal analytical characterization of engineered nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17435391003775266

To which principle does it apply?

R1.3

What is being measured?

If the agglomerate size is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Why should we measure it?

Agglomerate size is a measurement being made, and it is linked to hazaradous effects to the cell. Agglomeration status is in equilibrium with the matrix. No commonly agreed-on metric exists to define the agglomeration status. Also, information about the stability of agglomerates in different media would often be very useful.Aggregation is a more fixed status, and should not be mixed up with agglomerates.

What must be provided for the measurement?

If the value is measured and reported in the data, the following field(s) should appear in JSON-LD metadata:

Field Name Alternative terms
agglomerate size agglomerate_size,
agglomerate-size,
AgglomerateSize

How is the measurement executed?

The agglomerate size should be provided in a machine-readable format (JSON-LD) which can be queried using open universal protocol like HTTP.

What is/are considered valid result(s)?

The presence of the field "agglomerate size" in the JSON-LD metadata means the measurement is reported which is the valid result.

For which digital resource(s) is this relevant? (or 'all')

For nano toxicity related datasets.

Examples of good practices (that would score well on this assessment)

{
 	"@context": {
 		"bs": "https://bioschemas.org/",
 		"schema": "https://schema.org/",
 		"citation": "schema:citation",
 		"name": "schema:name",
 		"url": "schema:url",
 		"variableMeasured": "schema:variableMeasured",
 		"unitText": "schema:unitText"
 	},
 	"@type": "schema:Dataset",
 	"name": "Dataset title",
 	"@id": "Dataset DOI",
 	"url": "Dataset URL",
 	"citation": "Dataset Citation/Publication",
 	"variableMeasured": [
 		{
 			"@type": "schema:PropertyValue",
 			"name": "agglomerate size"
 		}
 	]
 }

Comments