Skip to content
Permalink
main
Switch branches/tags
Go to file
 
 
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time

TITLE: FAIR Maturity Indicator MI-R1.3-faf3eea67a-PCHEM_ASPECT_RATIO

Authors:

Ammar Ammar, ORCID:0000-0002-8399-8990

Publication Date: 2021-03-16

Last Edit: 2021-05-03

Accepted: pending

Maturity Indicator Identifier: MI-R1.3-faf3eea67a-PCHEM_ASPECT_RATIO

This maturity indicator falls under the FAIR principle R1.3: (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards

The ID of this MI is composed of the following segments (separated by hyphen):

  1. Acronym for "Maturity Indicator"
  2. The FAIR principle this maturity indicator belongs to
  3. The first 10 characters truncated from the SHA-256 hash of the primary reference DOI of this maturity indicator.
  4. A short name to distinguish the maturity indicator definition file

This MI is to indicate if "Aspect ratio" is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Maturity Indicator Name: The aspect ratio is reported by the nano toxicity study

This maturity indicator is extracted from the following paper Title: Minimal analytical characterization of engineered nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17435391003775266

To which principle does it apply?

R1.3

What is being measured?

If the aspect ratio is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Why should we measure it?

Aspect ratio is a measurement being made, and it is linked to hazaradous effects to the cell. Aspect ratio determines if an object falls within the WHO definition of a fibre, and is very important for health impact assessment purposes.

What must be provided for the measurement?

If the value is measured and reported in the data, the following field(s) should appear in JSON-LD metadata:

Field Name Alternative terms
aspect ratio aspect_ratio,
aspect-ratio,
AspectRatio

How is the measurement executed?

The aspect ratio should be provided in a machine-readable format (JSON-LD) which can be queried using open universal protocol like HTTP.

What is/are considered valid result(s)?

The presence of the field "aspect ratio" in the JSON-LD metadata means the measurement is reported which is the valid result.

For which digital resource(s) is this relevant? (or 'all')

For nano toxicity related datasets.

Examples of good practices (that would score well on this assessment)

{
 	"@context": {
 		"bs": "https://bioschemas.org/",
 		"schema": "https://schema.org/",
 		"citation": "schema:citation",
 		"name": "schema:name",
 		"url": "schema:url",
 		"variableMeasured": "schema:variableMeasured",
 		"unitText": "schema:unitText"
 	},
 	"@type": "schema:Dataset",
 	"name": "Dataset title",
 	"@id": "Dataset DOI",
 	"url": "Dataset URL",
 	"citation": "Dataset Citation/Publication",
 	"variableMeasured": [
 		{
 			"@type": "schema:PropertyValue",
 			"name": "aspect ratio"
 		}
 	]
 }

Comments