Skip to content
Permalink
main
Switch branches/tags
Go to file
 
 
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time

TITLE: FAIR Maturity Indicator MI-R1.3-3ce932c4f9-SIZE_DISTRIBUTION

Authors:

Ammar Ammar, ORCID:0000-0002-8399-8990

Publication Date: 2021-02-24

Last Edit: 2021-05-03

Accepted: pending

Maturity Indicator Identifier: MI-R1.3-3ce932c4f9-SIZE_DISTRIBUTION

This maturity indicator falls under the FAIR principle R1.3: (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards

The ID of this MI is composed of the following segments (separated by hyphen):

  1. Acronym for "Maturity Indicator"
  2. The FAIR principle this maturity indicator belongs to
  3. The first 10 characters truncated from the SHA-256 hash of the primary reference DOI of this maturity indicator.
  4. A short name to distinguish the maturity indicator definition file

This MI is to indicate if nanomaterial's size distribution is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Maturity Indicator Name: The nanomaterial's size distribution is reported by the nano toxicity study

This maturity indicator is extracted from the following paper Title: The Nanomaterial Registry: facilitating the sharing and analysis of data in the diverse nanomaterial community DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S40722

To which principle does it apply?

R1.3

What is being measured?

If the nanomaterial's size distribution is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Why should we measure it?

A list of values or a mathematical function that defines the relative amounts of particles present, sorted according to size â?? modality, peak magnitude, minimum, and maximum are included.

What must be provided for the measurement?

If the value is measured and reported in the data, the following field(s) should appear in JSON-LD metadata:

Field Name Alternative terms
size distribution size-distribution,
size_distribution,
SizeDistribution

How is the measurement executed?

The nanomaterial's size distribution should be provided in a machine-readable format (JSON-LD) which can be queried using open universal protocol like HTTP.

What is/are considered valid result(s)?

The presence of the field "size distribution" in the JSON-LD metadata means the measurement is reported which is the valid result.

For which digital resource(s) is this relevant? (or 'all')

For nano toxicity related datasets.

Examples of good practices (that would score well on this assessment)

{
 	"@context": {
 		"bs": "https://bioschemas.org/",
 		"schema": "https://schema.org/",
 		"citation": "schema:citation",
 		"name": "schema:name",
 		"url": "schema:url",
 		"variableMeasured": "schema:variableMeasured",
 		"unitText": "schema:unitText"
 	},
 	"@type": "schema:Dataset",
 	"name": "Dataset title",
 	"@id": "Dataset DOI",
 	"url": "Dataset URL",
 	"citation": "Dataset Citation/Publication",
 	"variableMeasured": [
 		{
 			"@type": "schema:PropertyValue",
 			"name": "size distribution"
 		}
 	]
 }

Comments