Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
81 lines (62 loc) · 2.93 KB

MI-R1.3-57299b68d4-IN_VITRO_DOSE.md

File metadata and controls

81 lines (62 loc) · 2.93 KB

TITLE: FAIR Maturity Indicator MI-R1.3-57299b68d4-IN_VITRO_DOSE

Authors:

Ammar Ammar, ORCID:0000-0002-8399-8990

Publication Date: 2021-03-02

Last Edit: 2024-04-13

Accepted: pending

Maturity Indicator Identifier: MI-R1.3-57299b68d4-IN_VITRO_DOSE

This maturity indicator falls under the FAIR principle R1.3: (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards

The ID of this MI is composed of the following segments (separated by hyphen):

  1. Acronym for "Maturity Indicator"
  2. The FAIR principle this maturity indicator belongs to
  3. The first 10 characters truncated from the SHA-256 hash of the primary reference DOI of this maturity indicator.
  4. A short name to distinguish the maturity indicator definition file

This MI is to indicate if the dose/concentration is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Maturity Indicator Name: The dose/concentration is reported by the nano toxicity study (in vitro)

This maturity indicator is extracted from the following paper Title: RiskGONE toxicity risk assessment quality measures Reference Website: https://riskgone.eu

To which principle does it apply?

R1.3

What is being measured?

If the dose/concentration is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Why should we measure it?

This is one of the quality measure that need to be reported by toxicity risk assessment experiments as decided in the RiskGONE EU project.

What must be provided for the measurement?

If the value is measured and reported in the data, the following field(s) should appear in JSON-LD metadata:

Field Name Alternative terms
dose in-vitro dose-in-vitro,
dose_in_vitro

How is the measurement executed?

The dose should be provided in a machine-readable format (JSON-LD) which can be queried using open universal protocol like HTTP.

What is/are considered valid result(s)?

The presence of the field "dose in-vitro" in the JSON-LD metadata means the measurement is reported which is the valid result.

For which digital resource(s) is this relevant? (or 'all')

For nano toxicity related datasets.

Examples of good practices (that would score well on this assessment)

{
 	"@context": {
 		"bs": "https://bioschemas.org/",
 		"schema": "https://schema.org/",
 		"citation": "schema:citation",
 		"name": "schema:name",
 		"url": "schema:url",
 		"variableMeasured": "schema:variableMeasured",
 		"unitText": "schema:unitText"
 	},
 	"@type": "schema:Dataset",
 	"name": "Dataset title",
 	"@id": "Dataset DOI",
 	"url": "Dataset URL",
 	"citation": "Dataset Citation/Publication",
 	"variableMeasured": [
 		{
 			"@type": "schema:PropertyValue",
 			"name": "dose in-vitro"
 		}
 	]
 }

Comments