Sec 5.8

[larseggert]

Markku Kojo said:

Sec 5.8

The MUST NOT requirement would be much better placed with other specifications in Sec 4 and would benefit from more accurate description.

[bbriscoe]

I agree with Markku, that it would be best to move this 'MUST NOT' out of the discussion section to where it will be noticed by implementers.

[larseggert]

@bbriscoe @markkukojo: would one of you want to propose a PR?

[larseggert]

Or @lisongxu, since he self-assigned this issue?

[bbriscoe]

I have proposed changes in a local topic branch, but I don't have permission to push it. Is this what you were expecting me to do?

I've att'd a patch instead, in case it's useful.
app-limited.patch.txt

[larseggert]

@bbriscoe you create a PR by pushing your branch to a fork or this repo on GitHub, and then click the PR button.