-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Short-circuit computeFSClosure when copying #14569
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1072,9 +1072,16 @@ void copyClosure( | |
| if (&srcStore == &dstStore) | ||
| return; | ||
|
|
||
| StorePathSet closure; | ||
| srcStore.computeFSClosure(storePaths, closure); | ||
| copyPaths(srcStore, dstStore, closure, repair, checkSigs, substitute); | ||
| StorePathSet pathsToCopy; | ||
|
|
||
| auto onPathDiscovered = [&](const StorePath & path) -> bool { | ||
| // Only recurse if the path does not already exist in `dstStore` | ||
| return repair || !dstStore.isValidPath(path); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this line is what @Ericson2314 had concerns about. If the destination store is something like |
||
| }; | ||
| srcStore.computeFSClosure(storePaths, pathsToCopy, false, false, false, onPathDiscovered); | ||
| pathsToCopy.insert(storePaths.begin(), storePaths.end()); | ||
|
|
||
| copyPaths(srcStore, dstStore, pathsToCopy, repair, checkSigs, substitute); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| std::optional<ValidPathInfo> | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
C API could be extended when the need arises. Now seems premature, so this impl-only change looks perfect to me.