From 38771badd3bd4e6a46495577506a3eacb299726c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Graham Christensen Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:02:13 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] nixpkgs: allow packages to be marked insecure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit If a package's meta has `knownVulnerabilities`, like so: stdenv.mkDerivation { name = "foobar-1.2.3"; ... meta.knownVulnerabilities = [ "CVE-0000-00000: remote code execution" "CVE-0000-00001: local privilege escalation" ]; } and a user attempts to install the package, they will be greeted with a warning indicating that maybe they don't want to install it: error: Package ‘foobar-1.2.3’ in ‘...default.nix:20’ is marked as insecure, refusing to evaluate. Known issues: - CVE-0000-00000: remote code execution - CVE-0000-00001: local privilege escalation You can install it anyway by whitelisting this package, using the following methods: a) for `nixos-rebuild` you can add ‘foobar-1.2.3’ to `nixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages` in the configuration.nix, like so: { nixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages = [ "foobar-1.2.3" ]; } b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add ‘foobar-1.2.3’ to `permittedInsecurePackages` in ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix, like so: { permittedInsecurePackages = [ "foobar-1.2.3" ]; } Adding either of these configurations will permit this specific version to be installed. A third option also exists: NIXPKGS_ALLOW_INSECURE=1 nix-build ... though I specifically avoided having a global file-based toggle to disable this check. This way, users don't disable it once in order to get a single package, and then don't realize future packages are insecure. --- pkgs/stdenv/generic/default.nix | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/pkgs/stdenv/generic/default.nix b/pkgs/stdenv/generic/default.nix index 34ba2fd8dd9c94..cb94db48f4bdc8 100644 --- a/pkgs/stdenv/generic/default.nix +++ b/pkgs/stdenv/generic/default.nix @@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ let isUnfree (lib.lists.toList attrs.meta.license) && !allowUnfreePredicate attrs; + allowInsecureDefaultPredicate = x: builtins.elem x.name (config.permittedInsecurePackages or []); + allowInsecurePredicate = x: (config.allowUnfreePredicate or allowInsecureDefaultPredicate) x; + + hasAllowedInsecure = attrs: + (attrs.meta.knownVulnerabilities or []) == [] || + allowInsecurePredicate attrs || + builtins.getEnv "NIXPKGS_ALLOW_INSECURE" == "1"; + showLicense = license: license.shortName or "unknown"; defaultNativeBuildInputs = extraBuildInputs ++ @@ -137,24 +145,62 @@ let builtins.unsafeGetAttrPos "name" attrs; pos'' = if pos' != null then "‘" + pos'.file + ":" + toString pos'.line + "’" else "«unknown-file»"; - throwEvalHelp = { reason, errormsg }: - # uppercase the first character of string s - let up = s: with lib; - (toUpper (substring 0 1 s)) + (substring 1 (stringLength s) s); - in - assert builtins.elem reason ["unfree" "broken" "blacklisted"]; - - throw ("Package ‘${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"}’ in ${pos''} ${errormsg}, refusing to evaluate." - + (lib.strings.optionalString (reason != "blacklisted") '' + remediation = { + unfree = remediate_whitelist "Unfree"; + broken = remediate_whitelist "Broken"; + blacklisted = x: ""; + insecure = remediate_insecure; + }; + remediate_whitelist = allow_attr: attrs: + '' a) For `nixos-rebuild` you can set - { nixpkgs.config.allow${up reason} = true; } + { nixpkgs.config.allow${allow_attr} = true; } in configuration.nix to override this. b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add - { allow${up reason} = true; } + { allow${allow_attr} = true; } to ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix. - '')); + ''; + + remediate_insecure = attrs: + '' + + Known issues: + + '' + (lib.fold (issue: default: "${default} - ${issue}\n") "" attrs.meta.knownVulnerabilities) + '' + + You can install it anyway by whitelisting this package, using the + following methods: + + a) for `nixos-rebuild` you can add ‘${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"}’ to + `nixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages` in the configuration.nix, + like so: + + { + nixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages = [ + "${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"}" + ]; + } + + b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add + ‘${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"}’ to `permittedInsecurePackages` in + ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix, like so: + + { + permittedInsecurePackages = [ + "${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"}" + ]; + } + + ''; + + + throwEvalHelp = { reason , errormsg ? "" }: + throw ('' + Package ‘${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"}’ in ${pos''} ${errormsg}, refusing to evaluate. + + '' + ((builtins.getAttr reason remediation) attrs)); # Check if a derivation is valid, that is whether it passes checks for # e.g brokenness or license. @@ -171,6 +217,8 @@ let { valid = false; reason = "broken"; errormsg = "is marked as broken"; } else if !allowBroken && attrs.meta.platforms or null != null && !lib.lists.elem result.system attrs.meta.platforms then { valid = false; reason = "broken"; errormsg = "is not supported on ‘${result.system}’"; } + else if !(hasAllowedInsecure attrs) then + { valid = false; reason = "insecure"; errormsg = "is marked as insecure"; } else { valid = true; }; outputs' =