New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle Hydra evaluation errors gracefully #6561
Comments
It's still an issue right ? |
Looks like it |
It's not the same but similar to madjar/nox#40. It would be nice to have a function that filters out all the invalid builds recursively from a set. |
@domenkozar iirc this discussion moved to other issues, would it bother you closing this instance? |
Thank you for your contributions. This has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no activity for 180 days. If this is still important to you, we ask that you leave a comment below. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". This lets people see that at least one person still cares about this. Someone will have to do this at most twice a year if there is no other activity. Here are suggestions that might help resolve this more quickly:
|
Currently there are two problems that occur if a package fails to evaluate (on purpose):
a) "broken" or "disabled" package is not propagated to reverse dependencies. If a package A depends on package B and B is marked as broken/disabled,
package A will still be evaluate-able and will result in an evaluation error
b) evaluation errors spams the hydra error tab page
Proposal to fix b)
throw
function that prefixes the error message with something that will indicate the error is supposed to happenpkgs/top-level/release-lib.nix
by regexing them out from the outputPrevious discussions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: