nixos/dokuwiki: add caddy webserver support

[onny]

Motivation for this change

To be able to combine DokuWiki with other modules that are using Caddy. This concept is unfluenced by this pull request.

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • other Linux distributions
• Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
• Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[onny]

@1000101: It seems all tests have passed now, do you think this is good now?

[1000101]

@1000101: It seems all tests have passed now, do you think this is good now?

Good job! I'm going to be honest as I don't want this PR to become stale - I'm currently in a rush and I'll have no access to my PC for next few weeks, so if anyone feels like testing/reviewing this, I'd be more than grateful. Otherwise, it'll take me some time to test this properly.

[happysalada]

Sorry to be adding more work for you.
Caddy has now support for a virtualHosts attribute in order to not override other configs.
When you have a moment, could you use that attribute ? (it would enable people to use caddy for other things)

[onny]

Sorry to be adding more work for you.
Caddy has now support for a virtualHosts attribute in order to not override other configs.
When you have a moment, could you use that attribute ? (it would enable people to use caddy for other things)

Thanks for the info and thank you for this important work! I rebased and updated my PR. It now includes:

• Support for Nginx and Caddy as webserver
• Updated test script
• Updated release notes

Works fine for me now :)

[happysalada]

The diff looks fine.
Was there some formatting changes included in there ? Perhaps you have an automated formatter ? Or were the formatting changes just the result of the refactoring. That one commit is a little intense.
Just want to confirm.

[onny]

The diff looks fine.
Was there some formatting changes included in there ? Perhaps you have an automated formatter ? Or were the formatting changes just the result of the refactoring. That one commit is a little intense.
Just want to confirm.

I used the concept and module template from the Wordpress PR here #84446
It already supported multiple web servers, so I adapted it

[happysalada]

The diff is harder to review properly, but it looks good.