Add mdformat plugins

[aldoborrero]

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Previous related PRs:

• add mdformat plugins #234916
• python3Packages.mdformat-tables: init at 0.4.1 #198094
• python3Packages.mdformat-gfm: init at 0.3.5 #198095
• python3Packages.mdformat-footnote: init at 0.1.1 #198096
• python3Packages:mdformat-frontmatter: init at 0.4.1 #198098

[polarmutex]

not sure why I am reviewer? lgtm, similar to my PR from before #234916

[dotlambda]

Any reason you use buildInputs rather than propagatedBuildInputs? See #287074.
Why are the commit messages not prefixed with python311Packages.?
This should be fixed or the commits reverted asap.

[dotlambda]

I'm fixing this mess in #287103. This PR should never have been merged!

[aldoborrero]

Any reason you use buildInputs rather than propagatedBuildInputs? See #287074.

At the time, I was learning how to package Python apps properly. So basically mistakes on my part.

Why are the commit messages not prefixed with python311Packages.?

I was not aware, again, at that time. Newer packages I have contributed related to Python has now that format.

I'm fixing this mess in #287103. This PR should never have been merged!

Thank you for your work and for fixing the issues and improving the withPlugins code. Even if you consider this PR a mess, it brought to the table useful tooling (albeit with errors, I do agree).