Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lasem: 0.4.3 -> 0.5.0 #53292

wants to merge 1 commit into from


Copy link

@r-ryantm r-ryantm commented Jan 3, 2019

Semi-automatic update generated by tools. This update was made based on information from

meta.description for lasem is: '"SVG and MathML rendering library"'.

Checks done (click to expand)
Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)

18 total rebuild path(s)

5 package rebuild(s)

5 x86_64-linux rebuild(s)
5 i686-linux rebuild(s)
3 x86_64-darwin rebuild(s)
5 aarch64-linux rebuild(s)

First fifty rebuilds by attrpath

Instructions to test this update (click to expand)

Either download from Cachix:

nix-store -r /nix/store/il7d1br6rp2iyza95nprzixma7fvby37-lasem-0.5.0-bin \
  --option binary-caches '' \
  --option trusted-public-keys '

(r-ryantm's Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)

Or, build yourself:

nix-build -A lasem

After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:

ls -la /nix/store/il7d1br6rp2iyza95nprzixma7fvby37-lasem-0.5.0-bin
ls -la /nix/store/il7d1br6rp2iyza95nprzixma7fvby37-lasem-0.5.0-bin/bin

Semi-automatic update generated by tools. This update was made
based on information from
Copy link

jtojnar commented Jan 3, 2019

This most likely follows GNOME versioning policy where odd minor versions are unstable.

@jtojnar jtojnar closed this Jan 3, 2019
Copy link

ryantm commented Jan 3, 2019

I asked about the versioning policy

@r-ryantm r-ryantm deleted the auto-update/lasem branch January 9, 2019 04:46
Copy link

ryantm commented May 26, 2019

It does follow the GNOME versioning policy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants