Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nicotine-plus: init at 1.4.1 #53717

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Feb 6, 2019

Conversation

@klntsky
Copy link
Contributor

commented Jan 9, 2019

Motivation for this change

https://github.com/Nicotine-Plus/nicotine-plus
Would be nice to have it.

Also, maybe it's a good idea to pin dependencies to specific versions?

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@6AA4FD

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jan 14, 2019

I wrote an expression for this, but it's less polished than yours, so I'm recommending yours be merged instead.
Builds and runs with nix with Gentoo. Might be a good idea to pin specific versions because the last commit was in February, and the last release with a few months before that, the maintainer(s) may not be keeping up with the libraries it uses.

@klntsky

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Jan 14, 2019

@6AA4FD

Might be a good idea to pin specific versions

I think so too. However, it's up to core maintainers to decide (I couldn't find any note on their policy regarding pinned versions anywhere).

klntsky and others added 2 commits Feb 6, 2019
@veprbl

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 6, 2019

@GrahamcOfBorg build nicotine-plus

@veprbl
veprbl approved these changes Feb 6, 2019
Copy link
Member

left a comment

LGTM

@veprbl veprbl merged commit 45fa569 into NixOS:master Feb 6, 2019

12 of 13 checks passed

nicotine-plus on x86_64-darwin Failure
Details
grahamcofborg-eval ^.^!
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-check-maintainers matching changed paths to changed attrs...
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-check-meta config.nix: checkMeta = true
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixos-manual nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./nixos/release.nix -A manual
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixos-options nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./nixos/release.nix -A options
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixpkgs-manual nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./pkgs/top-level/release.nix -A manual
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixpkgs-tarball nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./pkgs/top-level/release.nix -A tarball
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixpkgs-unstable-jobset nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./pkgs/top-level/release.nix -A unstable
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-package-list nix-env -qa --json --file .
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-package-list-no-aliases nix-env -qa --json --file . --arg config { allowAliases = false; }
Details
nicotine-plus on aarch64-linux Success
Details
nicotine-plus on x86_64-linux Success
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.