Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mcos-dark-xfce-edition: init at f0ec359 #57967

wants to merge 1 commit into from


Copy link

@LinArcX LinArcX commented Mar 20, 2019

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Assured whether relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits

mcos-mjv-dark-xfce-edition: init at unstable-2018-12-13
@LinArcX LinArcX force-pushed the mcos-dark-xfce-edition branch from 5239405 to ac9056d Apr 7, 2019
{ stdenv, fetchFromGitHub, gtk-engine-murrine }:

stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
name = "mcos-mjv-dark-xfce-edition";
Copy link

@ryantm ryantm Jan 6, 2020

Suggested change
name = "mcos-mjv-dark-xfce-edition";
pname = "mcos-mjv-dark-xfce-edition";

Copy link

@stale stale bot commented Jul 4, 2020

Thank you for your contributions.

This has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no activity for 180 days.

If this is still important to you, we ask that you leave a comment below. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". This lets people see that at least one person still cares about this. Someone will have to do this at most twice a year if there is no other activity.

Here are suggestions that might help resolve this more quickly:

  1. Search for maintainers and people that previously touched the related code and @ mention them in a comment.
  2. Ask on the NixOS Discourse.
  3. Ask on the #nixos channel on

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale label Jul 4, 2020
Copy link

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 commented Nov 29, 2020

Closing because the opener did not address the reviewer feedback in over 1.5 years.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants