Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixos/nilfs2: init module #65748

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

nixos/nilfs2: init module #65748

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@xaverdh
Copy link
Contributor

xaverdh commented Aug 1, 2019

Motivation for this change

Stab at implementing proper support for nilfs2 in the initrd (see #65548).

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
@xaverdh xaverdh requested a review from Infinisil as a code owner Aug 1, 2019
@xaverdh xaverdh force-pushed the xaverdh:nilfs2-module branch 2 times, most recently from 8a5d30e to 14195b9 Aug 1, 2019
@xaverdh xaverdh force-pushed the xaverdh:nilfs2-module branch from 14195b9 to 7a1a159 Aug 1, 2019
@xaverdh xaverdh changed the title nixos/nilfs2: init module [WIP] nixos/nilfs2: init module Aug 6, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 1, 2020

Thank you for your contributions.
This has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no activity for 180 days.
If this is still important to you, we ask that you leave a comment below. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". This lets people see that at least one person still cares about this. Someone will have to do this at most twice a year if there is no other activity.
Here are suggestions that might help resolve this more quickly:

  1. Search for maintainers and people that previously touched the
    related code and @ mention them in a comment.
  2. Ask on the NixOS Discourse. 3. Ask on the #nixos channel on
    irc.freenode.net.
@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale label Jun 1, 2020
@xaverdh
Copy link
Contributor Author

xaverdh commented Jun 1, 2020

Closing due to lack of interest.

@xaverdh xaverdh closed this Jun 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.