Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kubeval: don't include huge schema to save space in hydra #82816

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 18, 2020
Merged

Conversation

@Mic92
Copy link
Contributor

Mic92 commented Mar 17, 2020

kubeval-schema is a huge 7GB repository that we do not want
to build on hydra. Therefore make it optional.

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
@Mic92
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mic92 commented Mar 17, 2020

@Mic92 Mic92 changed the title kubeval: don't build against schema by default kubeval: don't include huge schema to save space in hydra Mar 17, 2020
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from kalbasit Mar 17, 2020
kubeval-schema is a huge 7GB repository that we do not want
to build on hydra. Therefore make it optional.
@Mic92 Mic92 force-pushed the Mic92:kubeval branch from ef06ed1 to 9d144b8 Mar 18, 2020
@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 52ee55f into NixOS:master Mar 18, 2020
16 checks passed
16 checks passed
Evaluation Performance Report Evaluator Performance Report
Details
grahamcofborg-eval ^.^!
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-check-maintainers matching changed paths to changed attrs...
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-check-meta config.nix: checkMeta = true
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-darwin nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./pkgs/top-level/release.nix -A darwin-tested
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixos nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./nixos/release-combined.nix -A tested
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixos-manual nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./nixos/release.nix -A manual
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixos-options nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./nixos/release.nix -A options
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixpkgs-manual nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./pkgs/top-level/release.nix -A manual
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixpkgs-tarball nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./pkgs/top-level/release.nix -A tarball
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-nixpkgs-unstable-jobset nix-instantiate --arg nixpkgs { outPath=./.; revCount=999999; shortRev="ofborg"; } ./pkgs/top-level/release.nix -A unstable
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-package-list nix-env -qa --json --file .
Details
grahamcofborg-eval-package-list-no-aliases nix-env -qa --json --file . --arg config { allowAliases = false; }
Details
kubeval on aarch64-linux Success
Details
kubeval on x86_64-darwin Success
Details
kubeval on x86_64-linux Success
Details
@Mic92 Mic92 deleted the Mic92:kubeval branch Mar 18, 2020
@johanot
Copy link
Contributor

johanot commented May 4, 2020

@Mic92 Good fix! Can we perhaps backport this to stable to get a non-broken kubeval in 20.03? :)

@Mic92
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mic92 commented May 4, 2020

@johanot can you make a PR?

@johanot
Copy link
Contributor

johanot commented May 4, 2020

Sure!

@johanot johanot mentioned this pull request May 4, 2020
4 of 10 tasks complete
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.