Permalink
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Find file Copy path
Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
91 lines (60 sloc) 4.1 KB
layout id title
principle
fp-006-textual-definitions
Textual Definitions

NOTE

The original wording of this principle (given below) and content of this page is scheduled to be reviewed. Improved wording will be posted as it becomes available.

Summary

The ontology has textual definitions for the majority of its classes and for top level terms in particular.

Purpose

A textual definition provides a human-readable understanding about what is a member of the associated class.

Recommendation

Textual definitions MUST be unique within an ontology (i.e. no two terms should share a definition). Aristotelian definitions (“A is a B that Cs” or simply “a B that Cs” where B is the parent and C is the differentia) enable meeting this requirement.

Most terms that have children should have definitions. For terms lacking textual definitions, there should be evidence of implementation of a strategy to provide definitions for all remaining undefined terms. In lieu of textual definitions, there can be elucidations when the term can not be rigorously defined.

Terms often benefit from examples of usage, as well as editor notes about edge cases and the history of the term, but these should be included as separate annotations and not in the definition.

Instances, such as organizations or geographical locations, can benefit from definitions although it is understood that definitions for instances are not required. It is recognized that OBO format (e.g., versions 1.2 and 1.4) does not allow this as an option.

Implementation

Logical definitions should agree with textual definitions. In fact, logical definitions can be programmatically used to generate textual definitions (see http://oro.open.ac.uk/21501/1/)

Textual definitions should be identified using the annotation property: ‘definition’ http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115. The source of the definition should be provided using the annotation property ‘definition source’ http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000119.

Examples

Class: reproductive shoot system
Term IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/PO_0025082
Definition: A shoot system (PO:0009006) in the sporophytic phase that has as part at least one sporangium (PO:0025094).
Logical definition: subclass of: shoot system; subclass of: participates_in some reproductive shoot system development stage

Class: chromatography device
Term IRI: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000048
Definition: A device that facilitates the separation of mixtures. The function of a chromatography device involves passing a mixture dissolved in a "mobile phase" through a stationary phase, which separates the analyte to be measured from other molecules in the mixture and allows it to be isolated.
Definition source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromatography
Logical definition: subclass of: device; subclass of: has_function some material separation function

Counter-Examples

  • No definition
  • Circular/Self-referential definition “A chromatography device is a device that uses chromatography” when chromatography is not defined elsewhere

Date Accepted

  • Revised wording for principle tentatively accepted June 19, 2018.

History

Original Formulation

 The ontologies include textual definitions for all terms.

Many biological and medical terms may be ambiguous, so terms should be
defined so that their precise meaning within the context of a particular
ontology is clear to a human reader.

Textual definitions (SOP) for a substantial and representative fraction,
plus equivalent formal definitions (for at least a substantial number of
terms). For terms lacking textual definitions, there should be evidence
of implementation of a strategy to provide definitions for all remaining
undefined terms.

Text definitions should be unique (i.e. no two terms should share a
definition)

Category:Principles Category:Accepted Category:Definitions