Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

6.1 meta #7

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 21, 2014
Merged

6.1 meta #7

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 21, 2014

Conversation

bwrsandman
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bwrsandman
Copy link
Contributor Author

2014-07-19 01:04:39,496 19282 INFO openerp_test openerp.modules.module: module partner_address_ldap: creating or updating database tables

2014-07-19 01:04:39,548 19282 WARNING openerp_test openerp.loglevels: The netsvc.Logger API shouldn't be used anymore, please use the standard `logging.getLogger` API instead.

2014-07-19 01:04:39,548 19282 WARNING openerp_test openerp.loglevels: notifyChannel API shouldn't be used anymore, please use the standard `logging` module instead.

2014-07-19 01:04:39,548 19282 INFO openerp_test openerp.loglevels.deprecated.LDAP address init: try to ALTER TABLE res_partner_address RENAME column name to lastname ;

2014-07-19 01:04:39,549 19282 ERROR openerp_test openerp.sql_db: Programming error: column "lastname" of relation "res_partner_address" already exists

, in query ALTER TABLE res_partner_address RENAME column name to lastname ;

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Thanks

👍 (code review)

@bwrsandman
Copy link
Contributor Author

base_partner_surname and partner_address_ldap are conflicting: they both want to add last name to 'res.partner.address'.

I think that field should be added in base_partner_surname and if partner_address_ldap wants to use it, make it depend on base_partner_surname

Anyone have thoughts about it?

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Yeah, I also think partner_address_ldap must be dependant on base_partner_surname.

Regards.

bwrsandman added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2014
@bwrsandman bwrsandman merged commit 0f36906 into OCA:6.1 Jul 21, 2014
@bwrsandman bwrsandman deleted the 6.1-meta branch July 21, 2014 15:55
kv1612 pushed a commit to kv1612/partner-contact that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2021
* BSCOS-35 BSCOS-36 Use pivot views as default in HR reportings

* fixup! BSCOS-35 BSCOS-36 Use pivot views as default in HR reportings

* fixup! fixup! BSCOS-35 BSCOS-36 Use pivot views as default in HR reportings
kv1612 pushed a commit to kv1612/partner-contact that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2021
* BSCOS-35 BSCOS-36 Use pivot views as default in HR reportings

* fixup! BSCOS-35 BSCOS-36 Use pivot views as default in HR reportings

* fixup! fixup! BSCOS-35 BSCOS-36 Use pivot views as default in HR reportings
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants