Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Change language to avoid talking about object operations #541

Closed
zimeon opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #545
Closed

Change language to avoid talking about object operations #541

zimeon opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #545
Labels
Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent) OCFL Object Ready for Review Ready for review by editorial group
Milestone
1.1

Comments

@zimeon
Copy link
Contributor

zimeon commented Apr 21, 2021

The spec is explicitly supposed to be about "the object-at-rest" (https://ocfl.io/1.0/spec/#note).

I think thus think that the comment in Version Directories "Operations that add a new version to an object must follow the version directory naming convention established by earlier versions. " should be rewritten to something for the object-at-rest like "The version naming convention MUST be consistent across all versions."
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent) OCFL Object Ready for Review Ready for review by editorial group
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.1
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Update wording to talk about version consistency in object-at-rest OCFL/spec
2 participants
@awoods @zimeon