Skip to content

Conversation

@AramAlsabti
Copy link
Contributor

Visualizes the gateway traffic with graphs and the LoRaWAN gateway (online) status.

NB. this branch uses the gateway status component from this PR.. This branch was not created from stage

@AramAlsabti AramAlsabti requested a review from GufCab May 12, 2022 07:49
@AramAlsabti AramAlsabti self-assigned this May 12, 2022
@GufCab
Copy link
Contributor

GufCab commented May 16, 2022

Issue:
image

Notice the dates in the graph are wrong. Something to do with the format of the date possibly?

…us-without-1242' into feature/204_gateway-detail-online-status-without-1242

# Conflicts:
#	src/styles.scss
Copy link
Contributor

@GufCab GufCab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comment on pull request

@AramAlsabti AramAlsabti requested a review from GufCab May 18, 2022 07:52
@GufCab GufCab merged commit c3fe17d into feature/1299_gateway-online-status-without-1242 May 18, 2022
GufCab pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2022
* Init gateway status overview.

Styling not done. Dummy data

* Adjust gateway status for responsiveness. Added TODOs

* Implement gateway status fetch. Update styling and TODOs

* Reset table page. Update gateway status logic and styling

* Add parent options for paginator and title

* Fix gateway status not fetching on interval change

* Optimize performance on gateway status

* Add comment to latest timestamp method

* Visualize gateway traffic and status (#85)

* Fetch single gateway

* Add empty gateway graphs.

* Visualize gateway packages

* Fix date and merge

Co-authored-by: nlg <nlg@iterator-it.dk>

Co-authored-by: nlg <nlg@iterator-it.dk>
@AramAlsabti AramAlsabti deleted the feature/204_gateway-detail-online-status-without-1242 branch June 23, 2022 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants