New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add inverse lagrange projection #1058

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 26, 2018

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@kbevers
Member

kbevers commented Jun 25, 2018

Courtesy of Michael Stumpf mi12st34@gmail.com

@kbevers kbevers force-pushed the kbevers:inverse-lagrange branch from 6e38026 to 1602fca Jun 25, 2018

@kbevers

This comment has been minimized.

Member

kbevers commented Jun 25, 2018

The failing scenarios should also be tested. I will add those later today or tomorrow when I have time.

x2 = xy.x * xy.x;
y2p = 2. + xy.y;
y2m = 2. - xy.y;
if (fabs(c = y2p * y2m - x2) < TOL) {

This comment has been minimized.

@schwehr

schwehr Jun 25, 2018

Contributor

Please don't do assignments in ifs.

This comment has been minimized.

@kbevers

kbevers Jun 25, 2018

Member

Oh yeah, I'll fix that right away

@kbevers kbevers force-pushed the kbevers:inverse-lagrange branch 3 times, most recently from 96c2a77 to ab79504 Jun 25, 2018

Add inverse lagrange projection
Courtesy of Michael Stumpf <mi12st34@gmail.com>

@kbevers kbevers force-pushed the kbevers:inverse-lagrange branch from ab79504 to 4e6b366 Jun 26, 2018

@kbevers kbevers merged commit 3eb56db into OSGeo:master Jun 26, 2018

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details

@kbevers kbevers deleted the kbevers:inverse-lagrange branch Jul 9, 2018

@kbevers kbevers added this to the 5.2.0 milestone Jul 11, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment