Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix up formating in CSP CS #411

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 6, 2020
Merged

Fix up formating in CSP CS #411

merged 1 commit into from Jun 6, 2020

Conversation

@rbsec
Copy link
Contributor

@rbsec rbsec commented Jun 6, 2020

This CS had some strange formatting where some code examples were given as backticked code inside blockquotes, rather than just using code blocks.

@rbsec rbsec requested review from mackowski and ThunderSon as code owners Jun 6, 2020
@rbsec
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rbsec rbsec commented Jun 6, 2020

@ThunderSon the linter seems to be flagging code fenced code blocks as an error when there's no language specified, even though this isn't required (and often isn't desirable). Can we remove this check?

@ThunderSon
Copy link
Contributor

@ThunderSon ThunderSon commented Jun 6, 2020

Sure, I'll add a rule to the linter in a bit

@ThunderSon ThunderSon merged commit 54aebc9 into OWASP:master Jun 6, 2020
2 of 3 checks passed
2 of 3 checks passed
lint lint
Details
link-check
Details
Publishing Check
Details
@rbsec rbsec deleted the rbsec:quotes branch Jun 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants