Q: Premise: "A woman is resting her shoulder on a man's shoulder while riding the subway."
Hypothesis: "A women is in a subway."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A woman resting while riding the subway means a women is in a subway.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Woman on four way seesaw with 2 kids."
Hypothesis: "Men and women are riding a seesaw."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Answer: People are on a seesaw. They are not necessarily men and woman since the initial woman is with 2 kids.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man in a blue t-shirt is throwing a bowling ball down a bowling lane." can we conclude that "A man bowls."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A man bowling doesn't have to be a bowling a ball.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A man in a brown jacket and green hat is standing with his eyes closed in the middle of a crowd." is it true that "A person in a hat."?
A: A person in a hat standing with his eyes closed in the middle of a crowd.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Two kids playing with a red sled in the snow." can we conclude that "The kids are sledding down a hill."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Playing with a sled does not imply sledding down a hill.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A starbucks barista offering up a tray of drinks."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A barista is in the back on there lunch break." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly:
He can't offer up a tray of drinks and be in the back on his lunch break at the same time.
The answer is no.