R & A: If women are wrestling in mud they are not wrestling in jello.
no
Q: Premise: "Two woman are mud wrestling in a kiddie pool."
Hypothesis: "Two women are wrestling in jello."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

R & A: Just because woman reads manual on cluttered desk doesn't imply with glasses.
it is not possible to tell
Q: Given the sentence "Woman reads manual on cluttered desk." can we conclude that "Woman with glasses is reading."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

R & A: A dog can't be a gentleman. Someone trying to open a crab leg must be eating crab and not fish.
no
Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A gentleman trying to open a crab leg."
Hypothesis: "The dog eats fish."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

R & A: One cannot be scalling a rock and standing on a skateboard at the same time.
no
Q:
Premise: "A man is scalling a sheer rock face with a rope support."
Hypothesis: "The man is standing on his skateboard."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?