Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young male is performing stunts on a blue bmx bike."
Hypothesis: "A man is attempting to break a bmx record."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A performing stunts on a BMX bike is not necessarily attempting to break a bmx record.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "These people are having a good time."
Hypothesis: "Some people are enjoying themselves."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: These people are some people. Having a good time can be more vaguely described as enjoying oneself.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A woman in a dress sits on a bench with her dog." can we conclude that "The woman has a dog."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A woman with a dog is considered to be a woman having a dog.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A young girl sitting on a wooden chair." can we conclude that "A young girl is sitting at a table."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: One girl is sitting on a chair while the other is at a table.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A young person with decorative face paint similar to a tiger's markings is snarling."
Hypothesis: "A young person had their face painted at the fair to look like a tiger."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: A person doesn't have to be at a fair to get their face painted.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A cricket player is bowling the ball as the batsman is getting ready to run."
Hypothesis: "A cricket in the woods."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly:
A cricket player is a person while a cricket in the woods is an insect.
The answer is no.