A man can hold a drink without it being for his friend.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A man stands against a tree while holding a drink." can we conclude that "A man is holding a drink for his friend."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


People with umbrellas walking past shops in the rain is an exact repetition of people with umbrellas walking past shops in the rain.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "People with umbrellas walking past shops in the rain." is it true that "People with umbrellas walking past shops in the rain."?
yes


A man who reads the newspaper can't be simultaneously be crumpling up the paper.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A man reads the newspaper in a dimly lit room." can we conclude that "The man is crumpling up the paper."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


A woman could be talking to other people besides her husband.
The question and answer are below.
If "A woman rests on the curb of a city street while talking on her cellphone." does that mean that "A woman talks with her husband with her cellphone."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


There has to physically be a man for there to be a man walking.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A man in black shorts is walking down the sidewalk."
Hypothesis: "There is a man walking."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
yes


Totally contradictory statement of player yelling at referee against player ready for a kick in first sentence.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Premise: "A soccer player gets ready for a corner kick."
Hypothesis: "A soccer player yells at the ref."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no