[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A running back maneuvers himself into an opening between two lineman as he attempts to run the ball down the football field." that "A footballer finds the gap between opponent to take the ball."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The specific action of a back that maneuvers into an opening to run the ball is more generally described by a footballer that finds a gap and takes the ball through it.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A spanish guitar paler and a lady dancer performing on stage."
Hypothesis: "Two dogs playing the guitar."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A Spanish guitar paler and a lady dancer are not dogs.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: If "Men are walking down a set of stone steps." does that mean that "Men are standing in a stone."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Men are either walking down a set of stone steps or standing in a stone.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A young man has his head inspected by the trunk of an elephant while other children wearing identical clothing watch."
Hypothesis: "Chicken in its coop."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A chicken is not a young man or an elephant or children.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "A man in a yellow shirt asking an man a question." that "Two men fight over a yellow shirt."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: One can not be asking and fighting at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A large white bird flying over water."
Hypothesis: "Bird is hunting fish."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A bird does not have to be hunting fish to be flying over the water.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.