[QUESTION] Premise: "Two members of opposite teams stand side by side in front of a soccer ball."
Hypothesis: "The teams are seated at home."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
If all teams are seated that would imply that no one from either team would stand side by side .
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A man sitting on a trolley."
Hypothesis: "A man in a trolley."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A man sitting on a trolley requires that the man is in the trolley.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "Two blue inflatable rafts are involved in a collision on white water."
Hypothesis: "There are more than two rafts on the white water."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Just because two inflatable rafts collide doesn't mean there are more.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A football team is running as the kicker touches the football with his foot."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The team is a college team." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A football team can be from any group not particularly from college.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A man in a black winter jacket and red shirt stands over a snowy slope with the mountains as his background." can we conclude that "A man stands in the snow."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A man stands over a snowy slope with the mountains as his background.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Masked protester surrounded by the police." can we conclude that "The police and the protester are on a trapeeze."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
One cannot be surrounded by the police and on a trapeze simultaneously.
The answer is no.