Q: Premise: "Buddhist man with glasses sits at highly decorated desk in colorful office waving around a peacock feather."
Hypothesis: "A man is holding something in his hand."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: Buddhist man waving around a peacock feather is the man holding something in his hand.

Q: Premise: "A man uses a blowtorch on a test tube while students look on in the background."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The old white haired professor is using a blowtorch on a test tube." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: A man using a blowtorch on a test tube in front of students can be anyone and need not be an old white haired professor.

Q: Can we conclude from "Two young boys playing on the rocks." that "The boys are playing video games in their room."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: no
Chain-of-thought: They can either be on the rocks or in their room.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A city worker places a street cone device which is verified by his colleague."
Hypothesis: "Worker places the cone device."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: yes
Chain-of-thought:
Since a city worker is a worker it follows that a worker places a cone device.