Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A white dog with red straps on it is looking back."
Hypothesis: "The dog is looking at its owner."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A dog can look at many things other than their owner.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A man holding an umbrella stands on the side of a street."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man with no umbrella looks out his window at the rain." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: An umbrella can not be held if there is no umbrella.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Two men are sitting at the prow of a boat on a river surrounded by greenery." that "A boy plays with a ball."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A boy cannot be two men. Someone who is playing with a ball is probably not also sitting at the prow of a boat.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "Number 28 slides in to a base as another player throws the ball." that "The runner makes it to a base."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Number 28 is the runner and he slides to base indicating that he makes it to base.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "A man wearing all blue is fishing."
Hypothesis: "A man is catching fish to feed his family."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Not all man who are fishing is catching fish to feed his family.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A man with a his arm in a sling and a business suit walks past two woman talking." is it true that "A man with an injured arm and wearing a suit  walking down the road oblivious to two women talking."?

Let's solve it slowly:
Walking past people talking doesn't mean that you are oblivious to them.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.