Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A bar with signs advertising beers such as bud light and corona."
Hypothesis: "A building full of people drinking beer."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: A bar with signs advertising beer does not imply the building is full of people.

Q: Premise: "A race car is smoking on the track."
Hypothesis: "The race car is on fire."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: The smoke could be exhaust from the tail pipe of the car and not because the car is on fire.

Q: Given the sentence "A little child is wearing a red shirt and a beanie and is standing on some jagged rocks." can we conclude that "The bear eats pigs."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought: A child standing on jagged rocks has nothing in common with a bear eating pigs.

Q: Premise: "An individual is launching his bicycle into the air."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person jumps into the air performing a trick on a bicycle." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought:
A person can launch his bicycle in the air for another reason besides performing a trick. He could have done it by accident.