[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A glasses wearing woman dressed in a white dress shirt and khaki shorts has a finger across her mouth while she is carrying two books in her left hand."
Hypothesis: "The woman has her toes in her mouth."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
She could not have a finger across her mouth and her toes in her mouth at the same time.
The answer is no.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "People look at the flames coming from the cars at a drag race."
Hypothesis: "People look at the flames coming from nascar wreck."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: The flames that are coming from a car at a drag race are cosmetic in contrast to flames that are the result of a wreck.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "A barefoot boy in shorts and a t-shirt jumps in muddy grass."
Hypothesis: "A person without shoes has dirty feet."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: The barefoot boy has dirty feet because he is without shoes.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "The man is smoking in the picture."
Hypothesis: "This is a picture of a smoking man."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The man in picture smoking implies the picture is of a smoking man.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A swimmer finishes the race."
Hypothesis: "With a cameraman right in his face."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A swimmer waves to the camera when he finished the race.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Two children are playing on a makeshift barrel swing." can we conclude that "The kids are burning ants with a magnifying glass."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Children cannot be burning ants while they are on a barrel swing.
The answer is no.