QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "An asian boy is holding onto the metal railing of a wooden bridge."
Hypothesis: "The boy is kneeling near a dog."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A boy is on a bridge and the other boy is kneeling near a dog.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "People walking in a town's street." that "A man is sitting in the kitchen."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A man is singular while people implies more than one person while walking in a town's street can not happen while sitting in the kitchen.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A man with a blue hat and blue with red polka dotted bottoms on is running into the water." can we conclude that "A man wearing blue and red enters the water."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Running into the water is a rephrasing of enters the water.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A man rides a sled pulled by a team of dogs." that "The man sits in a snow bank."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: The man cannot ride in the sled and sits in the snow bank at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "An older man in a white shirt and blue jeans carries a file under his arm as he walks down a busy public street." can we conclude that "The man in jeans is outdoors."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
An older man is refers to the man. And both are in outdoors.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A man in a red helmet has water squirted in his mouth by another man in a boxing ring."
Hypothesis: "A man in a fedora."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
The man can't be wearing a red helmet and a fedora at the same time.
The answer is no.