The toddler did not necessarily need to be learning to drum if he is banging a plastic hammer on a pot.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A toddler banging a plastic hammer against a metal pot."
Hypothesis: "A toddler is learning to drum on a pot."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


A cat is near some bushes is a vague way of saying a light tan cat laying down on a concrete ledge next to bushes.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A light tan cat laying down on a concrete ledge next to the bushes." can we conclude that "A cat is near some bushes."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes


A man licking an ice cream cone isn't necessarily eating chocolate ice cream.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "An old man licks an ice cream cone."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The old man is eating chocolate ice cream." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


The people are sitting inside a building so they must be in the same building.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "Five people are sitting inside a building." is it true that "Five people are sitting in the same building."?
yes


A bowling alley is where the man would be after rolling a bowling ball down a lane.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man stand there after rolling a bowling ball down a lane."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man at a bowling alley." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes


Kids can not be playing with bicycle tubes and playing golf simultaneously.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "African children playing on a dirt road with bicycle tubes near a village."
Hypothesis: "Kids playing golf."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no