Q: Given the sentence "A pitbull jumps to catch a flying disc." can we conclude that "The pitbull catches the tennis ball."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A flying disc and a tennis ball are two different toys.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "Man walking away from building with large tunnel-like entrance holding a drink and a man going into the entrance."
Hypothesis: "The men are walking in a tunnel like entrance with drinks."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: The men must be holding the drinks if they are walking with drinks.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A seated boy plays the accordion."
Hypothesis: "The boy is playing a song he loves on the accordian."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A seated boy plays the accordion does not indicate that he playing a song he loves on the accordian.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A white dog and a black dog holding a toy between them in their mouths."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two cats are playing with a ball of yarn." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A white dog and a black dog are not two cats.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "The military woman is examining a slide on her microscope."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The woman is in the military." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A woman in the military can be a scientist examining a slide.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "People walk along a busy street on a gloomy day."
Hypothesis: "People walking along a street with many cars on a cloudy day."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly:
Busy would imply that there are many cars around. Cloudy could be described as gloomy.
The answer is yes.