[QUESTION] If "A woman in a brown shirt talking on a pink mobile." does that mean that "A woman is talking on a phone."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A woman talking on a mobile is talking on a phone.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A shirtless man is sitting on the ground holding fruit."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A shirtless man is holding fruit." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: To be on the ground holding something is to be holding that something.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A middle-aged man reads a newspaper on a train."
Hypothesis: "The man is sitting on the train chairs."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Somebody on a train doesn't have to be sitting on the train chairs.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] If "A policeman in a blue uniform with yellow letters and a woman are talking." does that mean that "A policeman is talking on a cell phone."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A policeman talking on a cellphone would not be talking to a woman.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Two dogs play tug-of-war."
Hypothesis: "The dogs are playing with their rope."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Tug of war between dogs need not be with their rope only.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man standing next to another man accepting a check for 10." can we conclude that "000 dollars."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A man standing next to another man is waving a check in the air.
The answer is no.