[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A girl in a yellow hat is swimming with a boy."
Hypothesis: "A girl in yellow swims with her brother."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The boy may or may not be her brother and just because she has a yellow hat doesn't mean she is all in yellow.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A man climbs a large rock." is it true that "A man climbs up to get a better view."?
A: Climbing a large rock does not necessarily mean to get a better view.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "Man is crosscountry cycling in the forest."
Hypothesis: "A man riding a bicycle in a forest."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: Cycling and riding could mean the same thing and could be crosscountry.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man in a black shirt bowls an orange bowling ball." can we conclude that "The bowler wears orange and bowls a blue ball."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A man is in s black shirt not orange and bowls an orange ball not blue.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A man leaping into the air with a mountain vista behind him."
Hypothesis: "A man bows to the king and queen."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: If he bows down then he could not also be leaping.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two men involved in a mixed martial arts competition."
Hypothesis: "The men are going to beat the crap out of each other."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Involved in a martial arts competition does not imply going to beat the crap out of each other necessarily.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.