[QUESTION] Premise: "A young male is wearing blue shorts at the edge of a shaded area."
Hypothesis: "The young man is bird watching."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Wearing blue shorts at the edge of a shaded area does not imply that someone is bird watching.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A little girl in pajamas is jumping on the couch."
Hypothesis: "The little girl is bothering her father."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Jumping on the couch does not imply she is bothering her father.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A monk shooting a bow and arrow at the target." can we conclude that "A target getting shot at."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A target getting shot at is directly implied from shooting a bow and arrow at the target.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man in a neon-colored vest holding up a section of wood."
Hypothesis: "A construction worker holding a piece of the broken bridge."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Not all men are a construction worker. A section of wood is not necessarily a piece of the broken bridge.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Can we conclude from "A man walking around in a red robe and an axe in hand outside." that "A man looking to chop down a tree."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A man can be outside with an axe for reasons other than to chop down a tree.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man with glasses and a red vest operates a machine." can we conclude that "Man at cafe."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The man can't be operating a machine and be at a cafe at the same time.
The answer is no.