A clown can't be distracting a bull and blowing bubbles simultaneously.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man dressed as a clown is blowing bubbles."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A clown distracting a bull." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


The race the man is running may not be a marathon.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A man in black runs a race." can we conclude that "A man dressed in black is running a marathon."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


The dog does not necessarily have to be a golden retriever.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A woman is running with a dog in a grassy field with trees in the background."
Hypothesis: "A woman runs with her golden retriever in a grassy field with trees in the background."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell


Either the farmer is walking or he is riding. He cannot physically do both simultaneously.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "Farmer walking in his fields." is it true that "A farmer is riding a tractor."?
no


The car is in the mountains because it is in the middle of the mountains.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "Red bull car in the middle of the mountains." can we conclude that "There is a car in the mountains."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes


Excited would imply you are having fun and bored implies you're not having fun.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young child looking very excited about a christmas gift."
Hypothesis: "A child is bored with christmas."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no