Q: Premise: "Two basketball players keep their eyes on the game."
Hypothesis: "The two basketball players were looking at the ground."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The two basketball players cannot be simultaneously looking at the ground while keeping eyes on the game.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "A woman with a bag around her standing in the street."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman is walking on the sidewalk." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A woman cannot be in the street and sidewalk at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two children slide down a snowy hill in a bright green sled."
Hypothesis: "The children are playing in the snow."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Sliding down a hill is playing and the hill is snowy so the children are in the snow.
The answer is yes.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A mountain climber stops for a drink."
Hypothesis: "A man climbing a mountain needs water."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: It is logical that the mountain climber would need water and stop for a drink.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: If "Two women are reading papers on a park bench." does that mean that "Two women are reading newspapers on the wooden bench."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Reading papers does not necessarily mean reading newspapers and a bench is not necessarily wooden.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Young men are watching a woman walk down stairs." that "Young men are watching her so they can mug her."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly:
Just because they watch her does not mean they want to mug her.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.