A protester does not have to be protesting against Satan to be holding a sign.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A religious protester holding a sign."
Hypothesis: "A religious protester protesting against satan and his tricks."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell


An old man in dress pants and jacket sitting on a bench refers to an old man in light brown jacket sitting on a green bench.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "An old man in dress pants and a light brown jacket sitting on a green bench." is it true that "An old man in dress pants and jacket sitting on a bench."?
yes


A can be laying golf with a toddler but that don't make it his son.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man in jeans and long-sleeve green sweatshirt playing golf with a blond toddler."
Hypothesis: "He is with his son."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell


The hand is either the woman's that says 'no regrets' or the man's that says 'Only Regrets'. It cannot be both.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A woman's hand with blue nail polish and a tattoo that says ""no regrets."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Man's hand with a tattoo saying ""only regrets." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


A daughter cannot be a boy. One cannot walk and play simultaneously.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A woman and young boy walk down a dirt path." can we conclude that "A woman and her daughter play catch in the front yard."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


The tennis player lays on a court because he is lying on a court.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Premise: "A single olympic tennis player in red is lying on a tennis court with a racket beside him."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A tennis player lays on a court." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes