Q: Premise: "A man walking in front of graffiti on a cloudy day."
Hypothesis: "The man is laying on a beach."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Walking and laying are different actions. There is not graffiti on the beach.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Man in black shirt putting food into his mouth with his fingers."
Hypothesis: "Man in black shirt fasting."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: One cant be fasting and putting food into their mouth simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man in a black jacket walks past some graffiti."
Hypothesis: "A man on a motorcycle rides past a carnival."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Can't walk and be on a motorcycle ride at the same time. Graffiti does not indicate carnival.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "Three men draping a rope across a road." is it true that "The men were putting rope across the river."?
A: One cannot put a rope across the river and road simultaneously.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: If "Two men are standing in the street behind a table that has a laptop and a tv monitor on it." does that mean that "Two men are looking at a table with discounted merchandise outside of a electronics store."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Not all places with laptops and tv monitors are electronics stores.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A dog catches a frisbee in the front yard." that "A dog is playing in the front yard."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly:
A dog catches a Frisbee implies that the dog is playing.
The answer is yes.