QUESTION: Premise: "A kayaker paddles through churning rapids."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A kayaker is in a river." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: If a kayaker is on a river it means he/she is paddling through rapids.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A young couple posing on a couch."
Hypothesis: "A couple are on a couch."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Posing on a couch is the same as on a couch.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "Two young men play roller hockey on an indoor rink while a referee looks on near the goal net." that "Some men are playing roller hockey at an indoor arena."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Two men and some men are both plural. An indoor rink is an indoor arena.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "People look at the flames coming from the cars at a drag race."
Hypothesis: "People look at the flames coming from nascar wreck."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: The flames that are coming from a car at a drag race are cosmetic in contrast to flames that are the result of a wreck.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "The handle on the mug is small and would be difficult to hold with large hands." can we conclude that "The mug is inconvenient."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The handle is small and difficult to hold is the same as the handle is inconvenient.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "Cyclists seated on bench prepare for the race."
Hypothesis: "The cyclists are getting ready for the day long race."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
You can be seated without the intention of getting ready for an event or for a reason of doing some other activity.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.