Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man is working under a white vehicle while a child watches him."
Hypothesis: "A younger man is working on a car."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: A man is not necessarily a younger man and a vehicle is not necessarily a car.

Q: Premise: "Two people are underwater wearing black and blue scuba gear."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The two are ready to go scuba diving." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Being underwater already scuba diving does not imply being ready to go scuba diving.

Q: Given the sentence "A man carries two bundles on a pole balanced over his shoulder while walking down a staircase in the fog." can we conclude that "A man is carrying two bundles."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: Carries two bundles on a pole balanced over his shoulder' is an elaborate way of saying carrying two bundles.

Q: Given the sentence "A man in blue and yellow shorts holds his hand over water." is it true that "The man has no arms."?
A: no
Chain-of-thought:
The man has arms because he can hold his hands over water.