Q: Premise: "An asian family sits down for a snack."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A family sitting down eating a snack after dinner." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: After dinner specifies a precise time when a snack is happening.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A kid with white jacket standing in snow." can we conclude that "A kid in swimming trunks is jumping into the pool."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A white jacket and a pair of swimming trunks are two different items of clothing. Standing in snow and jumping into a pool are two different activities.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A surfer in blue shorts surfs over water." can we conclude that "The surfer is in the desert."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A surfer that surfs over water cannot be in the desert.
The answer is no.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Foursome plays a board or card game seated at a table."
Hypothesis: "The game is a strenuous athletic competition."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A board or card game played seated at a table in not a strenuous athletic competition.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "One woman is holding something up to her mouth while the other woman has her fingers on the side of her face."
Hypothesis: "Woman are sleeping."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: There is either a woman or there is more than one woman.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Young boy charges a flock of birds near a pond." that "A boy tries to scare off some birds."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly:
Young boy charges a flock of birds near a pond doesn't mean that they are tries to scare off some birds.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.