[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman in yellow walks next to a tree in the city."
Hypothesis: "A lady strolls outside in an urban area."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Woman is a lady. Walks is rephrased as strolls and next to a tree implies she is outside. City implies it is an urban area.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "Several children pet a pig while a crowd watches." that "Children are happily eating ice cream."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: If children are eating ice cream it is logical to assume they cannot pet a pig.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "Two children are running down the sidewalk in front of a building."
Hypothesis: "Children sit in the backseat of a car."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: People who sit in a car can not be running down a sidewalk at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "An abstract sand sculpture on a beach with a woman in the background." can we conclude that "A woman made a sand castle."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A sand sculpture does not imply that a woman made a sand castle.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Can we conclude from "Woman sitting in a wooden house turning a handle attached to a wheel." that "A woman is making butter."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A woman sitting at a wheel might not be making butter.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A person in orange pants is doing tricks on a snowboard while a person in a yellow cap watches." that "A tall human in pants."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The people doing the trick and the one watching are not necessarily tall.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.