Q: Can we conclude from "Older man is sitting in a car." that "An older man was sitting on the trunk of the car."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Just because older man is sitting in a car doesn't imply on the trunk of the car.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "The staff of a dhl pose outside of the building for a group photo." can we conclude that "The staff members are busy at work."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: The staff are not busy at work if they are posing for a photo.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Men standing with a thing on their heads."
Hypothesis: "The men are standing on their heads."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Standing on their heads is different than standing with something on their heads.
The answer is no.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Three men in kayaks battle in the rough water."
Hypothesis: "Men are surfing on a huge wave."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: One cannot be surfing and in kayaks at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "A man in an orange work outfit is sitting in a crane."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Waiting to be lifted." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A guy is waiting to to go to be lifted to the roof.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A mountain biker rides through a bike path."
Hypothesis: "A biker ride through a dangerous path."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly:
A mountain biker rides through a bike path does not indicate that he rides through a dangerous path.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.