Q: Given the sentence "A man holding a toddlers hands helping him walk in the snow." can we conclude that "A man is helping in the snow."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: There is no non-inferrable information in sentence two. Sentence one states that the man is helping.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A man in a blue cap is sitting on a stool under a tree." that "A man is climbing the tree."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: The man sitting down cannot be the one climbing the tree.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A girl with frizzy red-hair under an army cap and thick white rimmed glasses smiles as she paints a very colorful abstract painting on the beach while surrounded by other beach goers." is it true that "The girl is playing the flute."?
She is either painting or playing the flute. cant do both at once.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "A man is sitting at a picnic table next to a yellow van and a maroon car." that "A man sits at a picnic table."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A man is sitting at a picnic table is a man who sits at a picnic table.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A man takes aim at a golf ball as his swing is fully extended behind his back." can we conclude that "A man is trying for a hole in one."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Swinging at a golf ball doesn't imply trying for a hole in one.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "Children playing in a river."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Children napping on the bank of a river." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly:
Playing and napping are mutually exclusive activities. The children cannot be both in a river and on the bank of a river (which means that you are next to a river).
The answer is no.