Come up with a question and stream of consciousness reasoning that would justify this answer: no
The question is: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A kid is jumping his bike over a fence."
Hypothesis: "A kid rides a skateboard."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Stream of consciousness: The kid can't be jumping his bike while he rider his skateboard.