Q: Given the sentence "A couple in a red canoe paddle down a rough river lined with trees." can we conclude that "The couple paddle hard."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A couple on rough waters does not imply that they paddle their canoe hard.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A man in black shorts is walking down the sidewalk."
Hypothesis: "There is a man walking."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: There has to physically be a man for there to be a man walking.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "The man is walking with a cane and carrying a bag."
Hypothesis: "The man is going somewhere."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Walking with a cane and carrying a bag indicates going somewhere.
The answer is yes.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "An older man in a gray sweater and blue pants is shaping something in a forge on an anvil."
Hypothesis: "An older man has a gray sweater."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
An older man in a gray sweater and blue pants is a complete sentence for An older man has a gray sweater.
The answer is yes.