[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "One woman spikes the volleyball while the other attempts to block."
Hypothesis: "Women play volleyball."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Plural form of woman is women and spiking the volleyball is something you do playing volleyball. So sentence two is explaining in general what the woman in sentence one is doing.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A man is sitting on a wooden guard rail at a beach."
Hypothesis: "A person is at the beach."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Performing an action at the beach must mean you are at the beach.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: If "A snowboarder makes a jump in a competition." does that mean that "A snowboarder attaching his boots to his board."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A snowboarded that makes a jump cannot also be attaching his boots at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A family sits on a bench in front of a pool."
Hypothesis: "The family is standing."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
When someone sits they are performing a different action than standing.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "Man with fake blood and teeth on his face." can we conclude that "The man looks clean and professional."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Someone with fake blood on their face does not look clean or professional.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two men kickboxing."
Hypothesis: "The men are kickboxing."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The men is a way of describing more than one man therefore it can be a rewording of two men.
The answer is yes.