What was the question for this implicit rationale, and corresponding answer?
People who find something amusing need not be laughing. Something on one of the player's phones is not the only possible reason for hockey players to be amused.
 The answer: it is not possible to tell
The question: Premise: "3 phoenix coyote hockey players waiting to resume play find something amusing."
Hypothesis: "Three hockey players are laughing at something on one of the player's phones."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?