Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A child in a playground playing with the swing."
Hypothesis: "A child about to fall off the swing."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Playing with the swing does not imply about to fall off the swing.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A couple stands in the street with their backs to a large mirror."
Hypothesis: "A young couple poses in front of a mirror."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A couple is not necessarily young and their backs to a mirror does not imply poses.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man wearing a white jacket serves ice cream to several ladies from an ijs street cart." is it true that "The man serving ice cream is wearing all black."?
He is either wearing all black or not if he has a white jacket on.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A young boy wearing blue jumps off of a cement sidewalk."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A young woman jumps over a fence." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A boy cannot be a woman. One cannot both jump off of a sidewalk and over a fence at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A young man is holding himself up by rings." that "The young man is bracing himself with rings."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Another way to say that a man is holding himself up by rings is that he is bracing himself with rings.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: If "This picture shows a boy in a blue shirt leaning his head against a window with lots of beautiful clowds outside." does that mean that "Someone is outside."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly:
The first sentence tells us the boy is looking out the window to outside. Sentence 2 tells us someone is outside. The boy would not see that someone was outside unless he was looking out the window. So sentence 2 is a consequence of sentence 1.
The answer is yes.