[QUESTION] Premise: "A woman looks up from her magazine at something while the man sitting next to her keeps reading."
Hypothesis: "A woman takes a break from reading while a man continues reading."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The woman that looks up from her magazine takes a break from reading it.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A man in shorts and a black shirt is riding a motorcycle and wearing a red helmet." can we conclude that "A man wearing shorts and a black shirt rides a motorcycle and wears a red helmet."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The man is in shorts which means he is wearing shorts.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A woman is standing with a baby next to a statue." that "The woman has a baby."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Woman that 'has a baby' may also be considered to 'be with a baby'.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A woman in a white bikini riding a bike." can we conclude that "A woman laying by the beach."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A woman cannot be laying by the beach and riding a bike at the same time.
The answer is no.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two guys in red shirts playing basketball."
Hypothesis: "Two guys in shirts playing basketball."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Two guys in red shirts means two guys in shirts playing basketball.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "4 firefighters using a fire hose to put out a fire."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Firefighters are enveloped by smoke from the burning house." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
No evidence the firefighters are enveloped by smoke or that the fire they are putting out is a burning house. It could be an office building.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.