[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Ice hockey players are sitting on the sidelines." that "The players are sitting on the sideline."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The ice hockey players can also be solely described as players.
The answer is yes.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man jumps over a brown chair while skateboarding."
Hypothesis: "He made it over a chair on a skateboard."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A man can jump but does not mean he made it.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A cat is watching a girl construct a lego airplane."
Hypothesis: "A cat is watching a girl build a airplane and throw it across the room."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: Construct an airplane does not imply to throw it across the room.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A woman sits on concrete steps next to a drawing of a heart."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman walks through an art gallery." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A woman can't sit on steps and walk at the same time.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A small child is chasing water squirts in a fountain."
Hypothesis: "Nobody is chasing."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: The first states chasing is occurring and the second says it is not which is not what the first sentence states.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Man with a mustache standing next to a woman in a white shirt watching fireworks." is it true that "A man is standing."?
If a man is standing next to a woman then we already know that he is standing.
The answer is yes.