[QUESTION] Premise: "A man with an injured arm watches three policemen as one addresses the police van driver and two others walk away from the van."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The injured man saw the police do something." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Injured man is a rephrase of man with an injured arm.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A child holding a red toy hammer in right hand."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The child was pretending to be a builder." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A child holding a red toy hammer not necessarily was pretending to be a builder.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A police office riding a motorcycle in front of a large group of people standing behind a waist-high fence."
Hypothesis: "The police officer is patroling the crowded area."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A police office riding a motorcycle in front of a large group of people standing behind a waist-high fence does not imply that he is patroling the crowded area.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A seated man wearing a black jacket and blue jeans sculpts a bird out of a carrot." that "The man sells his vegetable art for profit."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The fact that man sculpts a bird out of a carrot doesn't imply sells his vegetable art for profit.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.