Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A little boy is holding a soccer ball."
Hypothesis: "Boy playing baseball."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: The boy cannot be playing basketball and holding a soccer ball at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A woman wearing a fur coat enters through a doorway." is it true that "A woman enters through a door."?

Let's solve it slowly: To enter through a door means the same as through a doorway.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "People eating at a table and one of them is giving the finger to the camera."
Hypothesis: "The person giving the finger is angry."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
The person giving the finger is not necessarily angry and could just be joking around.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A large dog wades through shallow water." can we conclude that "The pets are playing in water."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Wades through shallow water does not necessarily mean playing in water.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A man in an orange jacket speaks to a woman at a cash register at ikea." can we conclude that "The woman is with her daughter."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: The woman is at the cash register but is not necessarily with her daughter.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A biker rider jumping high over a dirt hill and seems to be higher than an electric pole."
Hypothesis: "A biker rider cant jump because he fears heights."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly:
The biker would not be jumping high if he fears heights.
The answer is no.