[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A mountain climber stops for a drink."
Hypothesis: "A man climbing a mountain needs water."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
It is logical that the mountain climber would need water and stop for a drink.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A girl sitting on a chair backwards."
Hypothesis: "A girls is sitting backwards on her chair."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: On a chair backwards is a rephrasing of sitting backwards on chair.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Woman in blue workout attire and helmet rides through dirt path." can we conclude that "A woman is eating on the ground."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A woman cannot be rides through dirt path while eating on the ground.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man in a red shirt walking past wall art." can we conclude that "A man is walking past a wall."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Wall art is on a wall so if a man is walking past wall art then the man is walking past a wall.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "Two young ladies gaze out of a store window at ""hair at hart""."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The two women are speaking adamantly to the hair dresser through the mirror." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: One cannot gaze out a window and speaking through a mirror simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A man in a white shirt and black exercise shorts walks on a sidewalk." that "Which is located behind a street under construction and in front of a two garage house."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The man was taking a walk on the sidewalk on a sunny day.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.