QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two field hockey players collide."
Hypothesis: "Two hockey players were swimming at a campground."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Hockey players are on the field and collide so they cannot be swimming.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A shirtless blond-haired little boy with blue jean shorts is pretending to mow some tall grass and dandelions with his toy lawn mower."
Hypothesis: "The boy is wearing jorts."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A shirtless blond-haired little boy with blue jean shorts implies the boy is wearing jorts.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A woman juggling oranges."
Hypothesis: "There is a woman  eating."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A woman can't be juggling and eating at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: If "Three young women in a city crowd are standing together and two of them are in the middle of high-fives with one another." does that mean that "Three women stand together."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Since three women are standing together. those three women are standing together.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A man with no shirt speed skateboards downhill." that "A man is skating quickly to get to a destination."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
To skate downhill doesn't mean that a man is skating quickly.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A young man performing a skateboard trick."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Man practices for x games." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
People can perform skateboard tricks without practicing for the x games.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.