Standing with a poster of another man is not the same as being with another man.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A child stands with a poster of another man along the streets of an impoverished area."
Hypothesis: "A child is with another man."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell


One cannot be scalling a rock and standing on a skateboard at the same time.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man is scalling a sheer rock face with a rope support."
Hypothesis: "The man is standing on his skateboard."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no


A man is walking on the sidewalk by a street sign.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A man walks on the sidewalk by a sign."
Hypothesis: "A human on the sidewalk."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
yes


A child is not a man and a pen is not a pencil.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A child in a blue sweater holds a pen in his mouth." is it true that "A man is holding a pencil."?
no


If a child is making a growling face he is not watching a baseball game but instead probably pretending to be the tiger he is dressed up as.
The question and answer are below.
If "A child with a face painted like a tiger is making a growling looking face." does that mean that "A child with their face painted like a tiger is sitting watching a baseball game."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


You cannot be inside and outside both and a Starbucks Coffee shop is different than a shoe store.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "The outside of a starbucks coffee shop."
Hypothesis: "The inside of a shoe store."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no