Q: Premise: "A black dog runs through a field."
Hypothesis: "A black dog is laying in the field."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A dog can not be laying down and run at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A child wearing a red coat and cap is holding a large chunk of snow." that "A child is going to throw a snowball at his father."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Holding a chunk of snow does not mean he is going to throw a snowball at his father.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A woman in a serving motion playing beach volleyball." can we conclude that "People are watching beach volleyball."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A woman serving motion playing beach volleyball does not infer that people are watching.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Can we conclude from "A large crowd of people are walking for the cure on a gray." that "Overcast day with a blue car heading in the opposite direction."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A blue car is coming at people in the opposite direction from which they are.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Guys in a canoe competition race."
Hypothesis: "Guys in a canoe competition race."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: The sentences are exactly the same; guys are in a competition race.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "The group of people in the river are using canoes are using their boating skills."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "People are canoeing." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly:
People canoeing are in the river using canoes while using their boating skills.
The answer is yes.