Q: Can we conclude from "A hockey player from the st louis jets is skating on ice." that "The hockey player is from the pittsburgh penguins."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: no
Chain-of-thought: The St. Louis Jets is a different team than the Pittsburgh Penguins.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A 30 somethings man playing with his phone on a subway train."
Hypothesis: "The man is playing games."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: A man playing on his phone doesn't have to be playing games - he could be doing a number of other things.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Worker with blue shirt cleaning of table in a cafe with coke signs."
Hypothesis: "A worker in a blue shirt is cleaning the cafe."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: A worker with the blue short and a worked in the blue shirt is a rephasing of the sentence. Cleaning of a table in a cafe implies cleaning the cafe.

Q: Premise: "A fisherman is inside of a boat rowing while a bird is perched on the front of his boat."
Hypothesis: "The fisherman is rowing backwards while a bird is perched on the front of his boat."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought:
There is no way to know that he fisherman is rowing backwards.