[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A person wearing a large black hat that obscures their face eats noodles with chopsticks."
Hypothesis: "A person wearing a large black hat that obscures their face eats noodles with a fork."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A person wearing a large hat that interrupt their face eats noodles with chopsticks and fork.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A person in pink pants playing a guitar."
Hypothesis: "A guitarist has on pink pants."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Saying a person plays a guitar is the same as saying they are a guitarist.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A man in an orange jumpsuit rests a hand on a very large reel of thick rope." can we conclude that "A mountain view."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A mountain view have no relation with a man in a orange jumpsuit resting a hand on a very large reel of thick rope.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man is sitting down and drawing on a public street."
Hypothesis: "A man is a street artist."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Drawing on a public street does not necessarily mean street artist.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "Two ladies are looking at jewelry." does that mean that "Two ladies playing bridge."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Two ladies cannot be looking at jewelry and playing bridge at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A dancer performing with a hula hoop."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "With judges in the background." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A dancer hula hoops in front of a pack of wolves.
The answer is no.