The boy hitting the pinata implies that the boy is taking part in a game.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A white boy is taking part in a game of pinata." that "A boy is about to hit a pinata."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes


The policeman is not a protester and he cannot be assisting a protester at the same time the protesters are scattering.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: If "A policeman assisting a young protester off the ground while the protester objects to his assistance." does that mean that "The protesters are scattering as the police cars come rolling up and teargas is fired."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


A man cannot be riding a rollercoaster the same time he is throwing a ball.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man is throwing a ball at a pile of blocks with stuffed animals in the background."
Hypothesis: "A man is riding a rollercoaster."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


The first sentence tells us the boy is looking out the window to outside. Sentence 2 tells us someone is outside. The boy would not see that someone was outside unless he was looking out the window. So sentence 2 is a consequence of sentence 1.
The question and answer are below.
If "This picture shows a boy in a blue shirt leaning his head against a window with lots of beautiful clowds outside." does that mean that "Someone is outside."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes


Just because a group of people are lined up doesn't mean they are all customers at a deli.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A line of customers at a deli." can we conclude that "A group of people lined up."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


Someone who protects civilians is using a defense mechanism to protect.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Given the sentence "A police officer with a riot shield protects civilians." can we conclude that "A police officer holding a defense mechanism."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes