QUESTION: Premise: "Two dogs sit in the back of a car."
Hypothesis: "The dogs belong to the same family."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: Just because in back of a car does not mean belong to the same family.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man is wheeling a gurney full of medical supplies."
Hypothesis: "A guy is pushing a table full of medical materials to put away."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A gurney isn't a table. Wheeling a gurney full of medical supplies doesn't necessarily mean pushing it with the purpose to put away (a table or medical materials).
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A young boy in a team sweatshirt is in a sports stadium near blue seats swinging a red bat."
Hypothesis: "A young football player throws a football."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: The boy cannot be swinging a bat and throwing a football at the same time. It's one or the other.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "A balding guy with a blue shirt along with a bunch of other people going down what looks like an escalator."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man in the blue shirt is on an escalator." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: He is on an escalator because he is going down an escalator.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man and a woman in winter clothing sitting in chairs by a lake."
Hypothesis: "Two people are sitting outside."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A man and a woman implies two people. Lake is outside.
The answer is yes.

Q: If "Two dogs run through mud." does that mean that "Two dogs run through mud while chasing a car."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
Two dogs running through mud does not imply chasing a car.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.