Q: Can we conclude from "A man in a neon-yellow coat is talking on a cellphone while sitting in a public area." that "A man talks on a cell phone."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A man in a neon-yellow coat is talking on a cellphone while sitting in a public area does not necessary that a man talks on a cell phone.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A bicyclist is riding through a crowd of people."
Hypothesis: "A person sitting alone with his bike."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Riding and sitting are different actions. Alone and a crowd of people are contradictions.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two men play guitar together on a boat with their friends."
Hypothesis: "The men are tied up in a trunk."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Men that play guitar together cannot be the same ones tied up in a trunk.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Man in red shirt watches dog on an agility course."
Hypothesis: "The woman is watching the dog do the course."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: The two sentences describe two genders performing one action. It can only be a man or a woman. It cannot be both.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "The baby seems fascinated with the pawn chess pieces on the chessboard."
Hypothesis: "The baby makes an opening gambit."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: The baby fascinated with the pawn chess pieces is not necessarily making an opening gambit.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A young boy is bowling at a bowling alley." is it true that "The young boy is bowling at school."?

Let's solve it slowly:
The boy cannot be at the bowling alley and at school at the same time.
The answer is no.