QUESTION: Premise: "A dog runs for a tennis ball in a backyard with a tile courtyard."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A dog on outdoor playing with a tile courtyard." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Runs (running) for a ball is often considered playing. Backyard is the outdoors in the rear of a residence.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] If "A man in a striped blue shirt is playing with a little boy next to his crib." does that mean that "A man is playing."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A man is playing is the same as a man is playing.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "Several asian children walking with two teachers." can we conclude that "The children are walking alone."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: They would either be walking alone or with two teachers not both at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "African american woman bouncing black basketball."
Hypothesis: "Basketball player dribbles."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A woman bouncing a basketball does not imply being a basketball player or dribbling.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A tour guide in new york is passing by times square."
Hypothesis: "Likely describing the history and attractions the main square has to offer."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
The tour guide is telling the people all about Times Square and the greatest moments in Yankees history.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A red race car travels down a road marked with red and white striped ribbons."
Hypothesis: "Nothing is traveling."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
A car is a thing. If nothing is traveling the car can not be moving.
The answer is no.