[QUESTION] Premise: "Two children jumping into a body of water."
Hypothesis: "Children jumping into the water."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Children jumping into water is a generalized form of children jumping into a body of water.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "Firefighters in full gear gaze at a building." that "Firefighters in full gear gaze at a building that might be on fire."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Just because the firefighters are gazing at a building doesn't mean that it is on fire.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: If "A rodeo rider on a bucking horse with a clown in the background." does that mean that "The clown is at the circus."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Not because there is a clown in the background means people are in the circus.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "The bird's feet are grasping the window tightly."
Hypothesis: "The bird is a family pet."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A bird can grasp a window and not be the family pet.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Police officers and others push a damaged car out of the way after an accident." can we conclude that "People push a wrecked car out of traffic."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: People constitute more than one person such as police officers and others. A wrecked car is one that has been damaged in an accident.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A puppy is gnawing on a plant branch in an uncut grassy area with wood and a barrel nearby."
Hypothesis: "The puppy is sitting down and not doing anything."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The puppy wouldn't be gnawing on a plant branch if they were not doing anything.
The answer is no.