QUESTION: If "A kid without a shirt uses an innertube for shade." does that mean that "The kid is wearing a shirt."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A kid without a shirt is not a kid wearing a shirt.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Kids playing around."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The kids are siblings." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The kids that are playing around does not imply that they are siblings.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A man stand with a can of paint on the street." can we conclude that "The man is empty-handed."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: If one is empy-handed then they are not with a can of paint.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Green cloth material in front of a street." that "With people walking by in the background."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Red cloth material lays on the sidewalk with people walking by.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A fellow in a green shirt plays a xylophone." that "The guy is in the school band."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A guy can play a xylophone in other bands or places than a school band.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Can we conclude from "A tennis player in a blue shirt and white shorts lunges toward a tennis ball on a blue tennis court." that "A player dives for the ball."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
Tennis player is a player and lunging toward a ball is the same as diving.
The answer is yes.