QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman in white shirt and purple headband is sitting and holding a pole with white a cloth."
Hypothesis: "A woman in white."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A woman in white could mean she's wearing a white shirt.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A woman looking outside a window."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The woman's house has no windows." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
You can't be looking out a window if there are no windows.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A bmx rider rides the ramp."
Hypothesis: "A bmx rider is part of a live competition."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Just because a BMX rider rides the ramp does not mean that he is in a live competition.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: If "A woman in a white polo shirt is moving a black statue of a bear." does that mean that "A woman hauls a statue."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Haul is nothing but drag or pull and in order to drag or pull something one has to be moving.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Firemen are discharging a water cannon." that "Firemen use a water cannon to put out a fire."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The fact that firemen are discharging a water cannon doesn't imply that they are doing it to put out a fire.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man has a racquet in his hand and is playing a game of tennis."
Hypothesis: "Andre agassi plays tennis with a racquet in his hand."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
A man holding a racquet and playing tennis is not necessarily Andre Agassi--many men play tennis.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.