QUESTION: Given the sentence "Two children are smiling for picture being taken of them in a swimming pool." is it true that "Two children are posing for a photo."?

Let's solve it slowly: Children posing for a photo not necesarily mean they are smiling.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A daring adolescent ramps his bicycle over another boy."
Hypothesis: "Both children are girls."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Both children cannot be girls if one of the children is ramping his bicycle over another boy.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "A man in a green coat checks the carriage equipment hooked up to his black horse." that "The man is looking at his horse."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: The fact that the man is checking the equipment hooked up to his horse implies that he was looking at the horse.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "A man sits down to place a phone call."
Hypothesis: "The male is using the phone."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: A man placing a phone call is considered to be a male using the phone.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A brown dog runs in a field while its ears fly to the sides."
Hypothesis: "A dog is chasing after a stick thrown by it's owner."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Runs in a field does not necessarily mean chasing after a stick thrown by it's owner.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Two men are helping a third fix his upside-down bike on a gravel path."
Hypothesis: "The men are in a bike race."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
Just because the men are helping someone fix a bike doesn't mean they're in a bike race.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.