[QUESTION] Premise: "A teenage boy does tricks jumping across a railing."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A teenager jumps across the railing." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Doing tricks jumping across a railing implies jumping across the railing.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "Men are working in some vegetation beside a brick structure." that "Men are working beside a brick structure."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Men are working in some vegetation beside a brick structure is a synonym of men are working beside a brick structure.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "A large crowd watches a wrestling match held outdoors in a big city."
Hypothesis: "Two isis members assemble a bomb as the illuminati observe."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A crowd that watches a wrestling match is not the same thing as people who assemble a bomb.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two athletes participate in japanese wrestling match."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A japanese wrestling match is between two people fighting for sushi." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Just because two athletes participate in Japanese wrestling match doesn't mean match is between two people fighting for sushi.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Four young people." can we conclude that "Including a very young child are smiling as they are squeezed inside a partially open big ball."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Four people are smiling as they get into a large ball.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man wearing white sits on a wooden bench against a white wall."
Hypothesis: "The man is standing."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
One cannot be standing while he sits at the same time.
The answer is no.