Q: Given the sentence "Two men hugging in a crowd in front of a brick wall." can we conclude that "The men are ignoring each other."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought: Two men cannot be hugging and ignoring each other at the same time. Hugging is not the same as ignoring each other.

Q: Premise: "Construction worker holding a metal slate."
Hypothesis: "A plumber fixes a leaking pipe."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: no
Chain-of-thought: A man who fixes a leaking pipe cannot at the same time be holding a metal slate.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman in a straw hat standing in front of a table covered in miscellaneous items."
Hypothesis: "The woman is selling the items."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Not all women in front of an item-laden table are selling items from the table.

Q: Premise: "Three dogs are playing with a red ball in a field."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The owner of the three dogs tossed a ball for his dogs to chase." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought:
Just because you see dogs playing with a toy outside doesn't always mean their owner tossed a ball for them to chase.