A person cannot simultaneously ride a BMX bike and a motorcyle.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A person wearing full biker gear is riding a bmx bike over hilly terrain."
Hypothesis: "The person is riding a motorcycle."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no


One can not be asking and fighting at the same time.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A man in a yellow shirt asking an man a question." that "Two men fight over a yellow shirt."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no


The locomotive was built in the 1800s and can still run.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A group of people watch a vintage steam locomotive (with coal car) on a track." can we conclude that "Separated by a chain link fence."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


One is about a man maneuvering and the other is a woman stealing.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A man maneuvers a motorcycle through a rocky stream." can we conclude that "An old woman stealing a motorcycle."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


The man's hoodie is either black or white. The man himself is either jumping over a log or taking a walk. He cannot do both simultaneously.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man in a black hoodie is jumping over a log."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man in a white hoodie is taking a walk." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


Two people does not imply couple and sit does not imply to listen to frogs.
The question and answer are below.
If "Two people sit on a dock with a sunset in the background." does that mean that "The couple listen to the frogs at dusk."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell