[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young child dressed in a yellow plaid shirt and a blue hat."
Hypothesis: "Sits and stares out at the water."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A young child sits and stares at the frogs and fish over the water.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "A team of young cheerleaders are cheering." does that mean that "Cheerleaders are yelling and pumping their fists as the player goes for the goal."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Cheerleaders cheer at more times than just when a player goes for a goal.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A boy leaping to perform a toe-touch in front of a tree." can we conclude that "A boy is in front of an oak tree."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A tree doesn't imply an oak tree; there are many types of trees.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two surfers are riding waves in open water."
Hypothesis: "Two surfers are in the open water riding waves."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Riding waves in open water is the same as in open water riding waves.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A group of men dressed in red are playing the drums."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A whale eats plankton." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Men and a whale are different beings. Playing and eats are different actions. Drums and plankton are different objects.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A customs officer leaning on a bike rack outside of an office building." is it true that "A customs officer smokes a cigarette during a quick break."?
Leaning on a rack does not imply he smokes a cigarette.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.