It appears to be contradictory that the woman is walking fast while using a cane.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "An old woman wearing a black scarf is walking with a cane down the sidewalk." that "The woman walks fast."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell


A woman is driving around with the car top down and the radio on.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A man." can we conclude that "Likely of asian or pacific islander ethnicity is walking down a street."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


First sentences said they were waling down the sidewalk so they can't be sitting on a bench.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A young couple waling down the sidewalk."
Hypothesis: "The couple were sitting on a bench."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no


A man with flawless eyesight would not be toggling his glasses.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Smiling man toggles his clear glasses in social setting."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man with flawless eyesight makes fun of some dork for having glasses." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


To be next to a vise is to be near a tool.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "An old man stands next to a vise."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "An old man is standing near a tool." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes


Dogs can be running for fun and not chasig a rabbit.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Small dog running in the field."
Hypothesis: "A dog chases a rabbit."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell