QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Friends wait and converse on a street corner before proceeding to their destination."
Hypothesis: "Friends wait on a street corner and chase the school bus."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: If people chase the school bus then they are not proceeding to their destination.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Several men are standing in a grassy areas with one man kneeing a soccer ball."
Hypothesis: "A bunch of men are getting ready for a game."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Men in grassy areas do not have to be getting ready for a game.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Can we conclude from "A russian man meditates in the lotus position." that "The man is russian."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: The man is Russian '' is a rephrasing of '' a Russian man.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Two boys play with two dogs at the shore." can we conclude that "The boys went swam in the ocean."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A shore is next to a body of water not in the ocean.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man in a black shirt staring into the distance."
Hypothesis: "The person is staring at something far away or nonexistant."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The person is staring into distance . Distance is nothing but far away.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A woman and a girl are looking at a hovering ball together."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The ball is part of a magic trick." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
A hovering ball may be part of a science project and as such it cannot be concluded that a hovering ball must be part of a magic trick.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.