QUESTION: Premise: "Boys in orange life jackets sitting on raft in water."
Hypothesis: "Boy's stranded overboard on a raft."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: Boys in orange life jackets sitting on raft in water does not imply they are stranded overboard on a raft.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man with a black dog sitting in a yellow kayak on that is floating on calm water."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man is sitting on a bus." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A man can't be floating in a kayak and sitting on a bus.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A baby in a life jacket on a raft." can we conclude that "The raft is on water."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: On a raft does not necessarily imply being on the water.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two men are using a jackhammer near a drain on a sidewalk."
Hypothesis: "The jackhammer is being used to fix the drain."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Using it near a drain does not imply it is to fix.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A group of people in white uniforms building human ladder."
Hypothesis: "Little kids playing on a playground."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
People are older than kids. Building and playing are different actions.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A group of people walking along a tree-lined path that has portable bathrooms on the side." can we conclude that "Two men st in a field."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
A group walks along a tree-lined path not two men sitting in a field.
The answer is no.