Cake is a different food group than oreos with french fries.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A young girl eats a piece of cake."
Hypothesis: "The young girl eats some fried oreos with french fries."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no


Red haired is different than blonde. Walks is not the same as skips. Cement is not dirt.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A little blond girl holding a stick walks down a cement path in pink capris."
Hypothesis: "A little red haired girl holding a stick skips down a dirt path wearing camo pants."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no


It is not apparent he's observing children playing in a park.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "An older man is sitting on a bench in front of a grassy area." that "A man is observing children playing in the park from a bench."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell


Dogs cannot be on an empty beach and also in the forest at the same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "Two dogs are jumping on an empty beach with waves." can we conclude that "Two dogs are jumping in the forest."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


There can be a man standing with nothing in his hands while a child runs with a ball.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A child runs with a bright pink ball in a field near a street."
Hypothesis: "The man is standing with nothing in his hands."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no


Kicking the punching bag implies that the kid is practicing his kicks.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A karate kid in midair kicking a black punching bag."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A kid practicing kicks." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes