[QUESTION] Premise: "A young child walking away from a pile of dirt."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The dirt pile is taller than the child." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Because is a child doesn't mean the pile of dirt is taller.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Two construction workers in orange vests doing their job."
Hypothesis: "The people are resting on the grass."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: People cannot be doing their jobs while resting on the grass simultaneously.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Adults with their children are standing on a rail waiting in line." can we conclude that "There are no children in line."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: It can be either adults with their children or no children.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "The cyclist in the orange jersey turned a corner."
Hypothesis: "The cyclist turned a corner into a dead end."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Turning a corner does not imply it was a dead end.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A man with an rc crane handling pipes." is it true that "A man is using a crane to lift pipes onto a boat."?
A: Handling pipes does not mean he is lifting them onto a boat.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two people are laughing inside of an asian nightclub."
Hypothesis: "The people are angry."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
People who are angry are not laughing at the same time.
The answer is no.