Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "The man in the jacket and tie is being interviewed in a warehouse retail store by the man in blue jeans."
Hypothesis: "The man is being interviewed for a management position."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Wearing a jacket and tie to an interview does not imply interviewing for management position.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "Man in shorts painting graffiti on wall."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man in shorts is installing a neon sign for a business." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Painting graffiti is not the same as installing a neon sign.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Skateboarders being photographed on a hill." that "The skateboarders are in the living room watching tv."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The skateboarders watching tv in living room contradicts skateboarders being photographed on a hill.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "Women sitting in yellow kayak with her dog." is it true that "The woman paddles out and throws the ball for the dog to fetch from the water."?
A: If you kayak then you wouldn't throws a ball for the dog.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: If "A dad smiling and laughing with his child." does that mean that "A mom is yelling at her son."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: The dad smiling and laughing is different than the mom yelling.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Black dog catches ball in the snow." can we conclude that "The pack of dogs played with a stick."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly:
A pack of dogs is an emergent whole while a single dog is an individual.
The answer is no.