QUESTION: Premise: "A man in sunglasses sits in a race car with an exposed engine."
Hypothesis: "A man in sunglasses waits in his race car with the hood up."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Someone who sits in a race car waits. An exposed engine has the hood up.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Man in blue shirt and jeans lying on some boards with a man fishing in the background." that "The two men are friends on a fishing trip."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
They might not be friends on a fishing trip. They can be strangers or the one man can be a hostage.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Driving down the road on a mini motorcycle." is it true that "There is a motorcycle on the road."?
A: The two sentences are talking about the same thing from different perspectives. The first sentence is a first person perspective of driving a motorcycle on a road and the second one is a third person perspective.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Numerous children gather around a table filled with food." that "Two children are playing on a slide."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: The kids can't be gathered around a table and playing on a slide at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "An african america women in a leaping stance with her arms spread open and pyramid like structures behind here." is it true that "A person in a leaping stance."?
A women has her arms spread open in a leaping stance.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A surfer going through a wave."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The surfer wiped out." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
The surfing actions of going through a wave and wiping out are different.
The answer is no.