Q: Can we conclude from "The skier is on the snow." that "The skier is standing in snow."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Being on snow when skiing is a sufficient condition for standing. Standing is required when skiing.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Two little boys walk towards a bike in front of a yellow wall." that "Two little boys run towards a ball."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Boys who walk towards a bike can not simultaneously run towards a ball.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "The dog crouched on the orange rug and stared at the tennis ball."
Hypothesis: "The dog is eating a treat."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
The dog cannot be staring at the tennis ball and eating a treat simultaneously.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A bike rider with a suit covered in advertisement prepares for a race." is it true that "The suit is advertising the bike rider's favorite brand of bike tires."?
A: A bike rider with an advertisement does not imply it is for the riders favorite band.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "The photo has been edited to be black and white with splashes of color on the bikes." is it true that "The band is back together."?

Let's solve it slowly: A photo is not a band and does not constitute reunification.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A skier midair during what appears to be a daring flip on a sunny ski slope."
Hypothesis: "A skier performing a flip."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly:
A skier midair during what appears to be a daring flip implies a skier performing a flip.
The answer is yes.