Looking at the camera isn't a hostile act to make someone fall over.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A guy in a baltimore ravens baseball cap holds something and looks at the camera."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man in a chicago bears hat falls over." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


To be walking with an umbrella one must be holding an umbrella.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A woman in jeans walking with an umbrella." is it true that "The woman is holding an umbrella."?
yes


You can't assume these small children are young girls. They might be boys. The sparkling rope may also not be twine.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "Two small children are twirling sparkling rope." can we conclude that "Two young girls are playing with some twine."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


Person who lies in hay alone can not be with a pig at the same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Given the sentence "A child lies in the hay with only a head and arm showing." can we conclude that "A child plays with a pig."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no