A man doesn't have to be smiling to set up a camera.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A man sets up a video camera before a football game."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man is smiling." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


People having conversation on a stoop doesn't needs to be a guy and girl.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A guy and girl sitting on the stoop with a jug of orange juice."
Hypothesis: "Some people are having a conversation on a stoop."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


The competing colors would not necessarily be hockey players. The ice would not necessarily be in a rink.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "Red versus blue on ice."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Hockey players play on the rink." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


Waterfalls drop water. So holding a can in waterfall means that one holds a can in water.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Premise: "A man holding a can in a waterfall."
Hypothesis: "A man holds a can in the water."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
yes