[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A blond volleyball player reaches up to hit the ball."
Hypothesis: "A volleyball player hits a ball in a pro match."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A volleyball player who reaches up to hit the ball is not necessarily hitting a ball in a pro match.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A little baby dressed in green and yellow wearing a bib cries."
Hypothesis: "A baby crying for her mommy."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A baby doesn't mean it is a girl. Just because a baby is crying doesn't mean it is for her mommy.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "People sitting in a vehicle."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "There are people sitting on a boat." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Vehicle can mean many different things from cars to truck to trains. There is no way to infer that the use of the word vehicle here means that they are sitting on a boat.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Male wearing brown shirt holding a microphone with an expression of singing." can we conclude that "A man singing to his fans."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Male holding a microphone singing is not necessarily singing to his fans.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "A group of preteens jumping at the same time." does that mean that "Preteens smoking."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A group can’t be jumping and smoking at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man in glasses is wearing a dark coat." can we conclude that "A man in a polo shirt puts in contact lenses."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Glasses are different optical pieces to contact lenses. A dark coat means the man isn't wearing just the polo shirt.
The answer is no.