Q: Premise: "Two kids playing with a dog."
Hypothesis: "The dog is playing with its yougn owners."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Two kids playing with a dog is not necessarily its yougn owners.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A car splashes through mud and leaves on the forest floor."
Hypothesis: "A car driving through mud headed to work."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: Just because a car is driving through mud it doesn't mean the driver is headed to work.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Many people raise a large sheet of fabric above their heads." that "Many people are sewing on a large sheet of fabric."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
You usually do not sew above your head so it they would not be sewing a large sheet of fabric above their head.
The answer is no.

Q: If "A red airplane that has left behind a trail." does that mean that "An ariplane is going at mach 5 speeds."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Just because the airplane has left behind a trail doesn't indicate that it is traveling at mach 5 speed.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man in a red baseball cap eats a chip."
Hypothesis: "A man at a baseball game."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: In a baseball cap does not necessarily mean at a baseball game.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A boy with glasses on is sitting in a chair at the dentist."
Hypothesis: "A boy is playing with some other childrens."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly:
The playing child contradicts with the child sitting in a chair in sentence 1.
The answer is no.