QUESTION: Given the sentence "A rainbow over buildings." can we conclude that "A rainbow is over buildings."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A rainbow over buildings implies that the rainbow is over buildings.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two males on a cliff edge and one is jumping into the water."
Hypothesis: "Two females swim in the ocean."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
They are either males or females. They can be either swimming or jumping.
The answer is no.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Young man wearing a wear jacket is behind a counter in a jewelry store gazing off into the distance."
Hypothesis: "Young man deep in thought at the jewelry store."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Deep in thought defines what the young man was doing when he was gazing off.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Man and child walking along the beach in the water."
Hypothesis: "A dad and his son are going to mcdonalds."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A child may be a boy or a girl and McDonalds is not in the water.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A woman is rolling fresh tortillas." can we conclude that "A woman is making fresh torillas for her family for dinner."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A woman rolling fresh tortillas may not be making them for her family for dinner.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A woman in a pink shirt stares down a path."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman in a pink shirt eats candy all day." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
A woman can not stare down a path if she eats candy all day.
The answer is no.