Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

D6.1: Full-text Search (Formulae + Keywords) over LaTeX-based Documents (e.g. the arXiv subset) #133

Closed
minrk opened this issue Sep 8, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@minrk
Copy link
Contributor

@minrk minrk commented Sep 8, 2015

@minrk minrk added this to the D6.1 milestone Sep 8, 2015
@kohlhase kohlhase self-assigned this Sep 15, 2015
@nthiery nthiery added this to the Month 9: 2016-05-31 milestone Mar 22, 2016
@nthiery nthiery removed this from the D6.1 milestone Mar 22, 2016
@kohlhase
Copy link
Member

@kohlhase kohlhase commented Jun 14, 2016

I committed a first draft of report to WP6/D6.1. Please have a look. Iwill give the report a throrough reading today and finish it up by tonight.

Loading

@kohlhase
Copy link
Member

@kohlhase kohlhase commented Jun 14, 2016

I have committed the final version, this now needs to be submitted to the EU.

Loading

@kohlhase kohlhase closed this Jun 14, 2016
@nthiery nthiery reopened this Jun 16, 2016
@nthiery
Copy link
Contributor

@nthiery nthiery commented Jun 16, 2016

Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for your hard and timely work. I just got the time to double check on this. I made some minor fixes to get the file to compile on my machine. Please check the file from the "Final report" link above.
You may want to add a short description of the work in the issue description above (e.g. a copy of the abstract).
I'll close the issue once I'll get confirmation from you and will have uploaded the file on the EU portal.

Loading

@nthiery
Copy link
Contributor

@nthiery nthiery commented Jun 27, 2016

Report submitted to EU

Loading

@nthiery nthiery closed this Jun 27, 2016
@bpilorget
Copy link
Contributor

@bpilorget bpilorget commented Oct 24, 2016

DELIVERABLES UPDATE

@kohlhase As you know , during the interim review in Bremen, reviewers gave advice to improve deliverables. UPSud tried to follow their advice by updating D5.1 #107
The main critic is that deliverables should be static document. Therefore we went through the #107 report to check if all links were still working and also if the information contained on the links was necessary for the understanding of the report.
As a result when it was necessary annexes were added to the #107 report.

Can you please do the same for this deliverable and add annexes when need be?

Loading

@nthiery
Copy link
Contributor

@nthiery nthiery commented Jan 4, 2017

The reviewers had pointed to this specific report as a good example. I checked it briefly, recompiled it w.r.t. the latest style file, and resubmitted.

Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
4 participants