New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve time estimates #1116
Comments
😄 I think it's more of a "guessing game" Each stage in the ODM pipeline has a It indicates the overall of a stage (e.g. the Each stage in turn can update it's own internal progress: https://github.com/OpenDroneMap/ODM/blob/master/stages/run_opensfm.py#L34 These values should go from 0 to 100 and they represent the fraction of progress. So calling |
If no call to |
We used to have something like this several versions ago; I opted to remove it since it made the UI simpler (we have more than 7 stages and it seemed overwhelming). Not against reintroducing it if somebody opens a PR with a clean UI... |
I think it could potentially address folks' consternation about what's happening if they have a more concrete idea of what step they're in, what step is next, etc, especially since we have some expectations about which steps are the heaviest and most likely to fail. But yeah, I can see how it could look crowded.... hmm |
User-story for segmented Progress Bar to act as summary of Processing Log: |
Improving time estimates is a fool's errand, which makes it perfect for me.
I'd like to improve the proportion complete estimates. I used to know where these are set, but my brain is mush, and I cannot find it. Point me to the right place and I plan to update these values with a medium size dataset: something that for most folks will take a while to process (where the proportion of time between portions of the project matter the most). It won't be ideal for small datasets (for which we are already tuned), nor for massive ones. But it should help for projects that take long enough to notice and for which people are likely to be watching the progress bar.
Like I said. Fool's errand. But like a fool, I've processed a lot of data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: