Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possibly publish a small optimization release ~2-3 months after Next #17307

Open
reaperrr opened this issue Nov 3, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@reaperrr
Copy link
Contributor

@reaperrr reaperrr commented Nov 3, 2019

This release cycle already took too long, and some of the plans for Next+1 may again lead to a rather long and tricky test-bugfix-playtest-bugfix-playtest cycle.

Additionally, some of us devs suffer from both time constraints and mental/motivational exhaustion from the current release cycle, so the next few months are likely to remain slow in terms of progress on bleed.

The catch is that due to the amount of changes the current release cycle introduced, chances are rather high that even those playtests may not be enough to catch everything in time, plus there are already some PRs filed that, while too late/risky to be picked to prep this short before the planned release, still look like good candidates for a relatively quick follow-up release, due to either being bugfixes or having a (presumably) good "low risk, notable benefit" ratio.

This meta issue is meant as a place to collect those candidates until we make the call whether such a stop-gap release would make sense or we'd be better off moving on and just trying to keep Next+1 a bit more focused in scope and and amount of code changes.

Note: To keep scope and risks limited, only PRs that should be backwards-compatible with prep-1908 and are generally low-risk/easy-to-test should be included.

Bugfixes:

Mod improvements:

AI fixes:

AI modding improvements:

Performance improvements:

  • #17281
  • #17274 + follow-up increasing default weight to ~150%
@matjaeck

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@matjaeck matjaeck commented Nov 9, 2019

After reconsidering, I think we should try to add #17312 here and make it an AI overhaul themed release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.