Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Making fake structure prices consistent #16188

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 22, 2019

Conversation

Projects
None yet
6 participants
@Punsho
Copy link

Punsho commented Feb 9, 2019

Punsho Punsho
@MustaphaTR

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

MustaphaTR commented Feb 10, 2019

ConYard seem to have Valued: 2500. I guess 2k is the MCV's cost. I think changing ConYard's cost to 2k too makes sense. I see no reason ConYard should give more sell cash/bounty than it should according to cost of MCV.

@Punsho

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

Punsho commented Feb 10, 2019

The reason might be to make it less punishing for selling a conyard and for it to give more soldiers on sell

@GraionDilach

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

GraionDilach commented Feb 10, 2019

The lack of consistency throws off the value graph as well though.

@MustaphaTR

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

MustaphaTR commented Feb 10, 2019

The Army value graph doesn't count MCV/ConYard.

@pchote

pchote approved these changes Feb 22, 2019

@pchote pchote merged commit 621a42b into OpenRA:bleed Feb 22, 2019

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.