New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Download in Newick format dysfunctional #419

Open
opentreeapi opened this Issue Sep 13, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@opentreeapi

opentreeapi commented Sep 13, 2018

Starting from a few weeks ago, I cannot download a subtree anymore in Newick format. There seems to have been also some change with the download URL recently. I need to download regularly the vertebrate subtree (https://tree.opentreeoflife.org/opentree/default/download_subtree/node-id/ott801601/Vertebrata) and luckily I have an old version of the tree, which works for my script, but it will become outdated with time :-(

================================================
Metadata | Do not edit below this line
:------------|:----------
Author | mjeltsch
Upvotes | 0
URL | /contact
Target node label |
Synthetic tree id |
Synthetic tree node id |
Source tree id(s) |
Open Tree Taxonomy id |
Supporting reference | None

@mtholder

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mtholder

mtholder Sep 13, 2018

Member

hmm that is odd that it changed a few weeks ago. we did change some of the back-end software on Monday. I'll try to figure out what is going on. There is a limit on the number of tips that can be downloaded from the web services. But if you have the entire vertebrate tree via a previous download, that seems like a poor explanation...

Member

mtholder commented Sep 13, 2018

hmm that is odd that it changed a few weeks ago. we did change some of the back-end software on Monday. I'll try to figure out what is going on. There is a limit on the number of tips that can be downloaded from the web services. But if you have the entire vertebrate tree via a previous download, that seems like a poor explanation...

@mtholder

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mtholder

mtholder Sep 13, 2018

Member

and thanks for the bug report!

Member

mtholder commented Sep 13, 2018

and thanks for the bug report!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment