Docker image CI FIX #78
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Well I guess I broke free of some restrains DCgg7RQ7tgG1HjYYq1uE4L6Ax5ErM9A9fk if you want. No need to do I really need to use this account from now on?❤️ |
No need, you should have access again @11Tuvork28. 🙏 |
I saw it randomly because I was updating all services and just saw last image and was like what? Gotta fix that XD |
|
The Docker whale comes back to life. 🐋Just waiting on @Duddino 's review and we'll merge it right in. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Abstract
Fixes the issue #77, while also improving the image size. This leads to saving in bandwidth and also enables hosters like me to again autopull the image without it being to big without reason.
What does this PR address?
Fixes failing CI auto builds
What features or improvements were added?
Nothing but reduced image size.
How does this benefit users?
Not the users but the ones hosting an instance, as image pulling bandwidth is reduced.
I don't want anything for it keep it, like we would have done all along.
In love
Zozo the hellhound <3