Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revoking Certificates #78

Closed
colinramsay opened this issue Feb 2, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed

Revoking Certificates #78

colinramsay opened this issue Feb 2, 2016 · 8 comments
Labels
enhancement testing
Milestone
v1.9.8

Comments

@colinramsay
Copy link

Is there any way to revoke a certificate?
@rkerber
Copy link
Collaborator

rkerber commented Feb 2, 2016

ACMESharp doesn't support revokation yet, ebekker/ACMESharp#57

However you can revoke a cert using the linux client. You will just need the .pem file that the app created. That should be under %appdata%\letsencrypt-win-simple\BaseURI.

@rkerber rkerber mentioned this issue Apr 10, 2016
Closed
@rkerber
Copy link
Collaborator

rkerber commented Apr 10, 2016

If anyone wants to see this enhancement, add your +1 (via add your reaction) to the first comment of this issue.

@bigrck64
Copy link

Yes, adding revokation will be a great addition when ACMESharp will have implemented it !

@Micrologiciel
Copy link

up :)

@Marcus-L
Copy link

Marcus-L commented Oct 9, 2017

I submitted ebekker/ACMESharp#301 to ACMESharp just now to add RevokeCertificate to AcmeClient

@Marcus-L Marcus-L mentioned this issue Oct 9, 2017
Merged
@WouterTinus
Copy link
Member

That's good news! Let's hope it get merged in soon.

@WouterTinus
Copy link
Member

It landed in ACMESharp, so now it's up to us to implement it in LEWS.

@WouterTinus WouterTinus added this to the v1.9.8 milestone Oct 28, 2017
@WouterTinus
Copy link
Member

Released in v1.9.8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement testing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.9.8
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@colinramsay @Marcus-L @rkerber @bigrck64 @WouterTinus @Micrologiciel