Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove duplicate OMA references #278

Open
cthoyt opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Remove duplicate OMA references #278

cthoyt opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@cthoyt
Copy link

cthoyt commented Jun 22, 2022

In the Ontology Quality Assessment, I found that there was an unknown prefix oma (see https://cthoyt.com/oquat/unknowns/prefix/oma). This apparently only appears in definition xrefs in PRO entries that shadow UniProt identifiers - it's not really an appropriate use of this field, and even further, it just duplicates the identifier already available in the term's URI itself as well as the dbxref to uniprot.

For example PR pages that shadow UniProt identifiers like https://proconsortium.org/app/entry/PR:Q01112 have links to OMA as if they're xrefs.

Related: I also added OMA as a provider in the Bioregistry in biopragmatics/bioregistry#433

@nataled
Copy link
Collaborator

nataled commented Jun 25, 2022

The links to OMA 'as if they're xrefs' is--if I understand what you're seeing correctly--a long-standing failing on the part of the OBO-to-OWL conversion. They are intended as links to evidence for orthology. As such, they are not the same as UniProtKB xrefs (in fact, only those PR terms with such evidence have the OMA link, and these are a subset of PR terms with UniProtKB xrefs).

Thank you for the addition of OMA to the Bioregistry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants