From 3c84ebec62ee9ce8ea8ec49437613b55b6068557 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yangyaming Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:17:03 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] IndicateDataType --> GetKernelType --- paddle/operators/chunk_eval_op.cc | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/paddle/operators/chunk_eval_op.cc b/paddle/operators/chunk_eval_op.cc index a3d0d99646491..309660b01fe70 100644 --- a/paddle/operators/chunk_eval_op.cc +++ b/paddle/operators/chunk_eval_op.cc @@ -45,9 +45,10 @@ class ChunkEvalOp : public framework::OperatorWithKernel { } protected: - framework::DataType IndicateDataType( + framework::OpKernelType GetKernelType( const framework::ExecutionContext &ctx) const override { - return framework::DataType::FP32; + return framework::OpKernelType(framework::DataType::FP32, + ctx.device_context()); } }; @@ -82,12 +83,12 @@ class ChunkEvalOpMaker : public framework::OpProtoAndCheckerMaker { "See below for details.") .SetDefault(std::vector{}); AddComment(R"DOC( -For some basics of chunking, please refer to +For some basics of chunking, please refer to ‘Chunking with Support Vector Mechines ’. -CheckEvalOp computes the precision, recall, and F1-score of chunk detection, -and supports IOB, IOE, IOBES and IO (also known as plain) tagging schemes. +CheckEvalOp computes the precision, recall, and F1-score of chunk detection, +and supports IOB, IOE, IOBES and IO (also known as plain) tagging schemes. Here is a NER example of labeling for these tagging schemes: Li Ming works at Agricultural Bank of China in Beijing. @@ -96,17 +97,17 @@ Here is a NER example of labeling for these tagging schemes: IOE: I-PER E-PER O O I-ORG I-ORG I-ORG E-ORG O E-LOC IOBES: B-PER E-PER O O I-ORG I-ORG I-ORG E-ORG O S-LOC -There are three chunk types(named entity types) including PER(person), ORG(orgnazation) +There are three chunk types(named entity types) including PER(person), ORG(orgnazation) and LOC(LOCATION), and we can see that the labels have the form -. -Since the calculations actually use label ids rather than labels, extra attention -should be paid when mapping labels to ids to make CheckEvalOp work. The key point -is that the listed equations are satisfied by ids. +Since the calculations actually use label ids rather than labels, extra attention +should be paid when mapping labels to ids to make CheckEvalOp work. The key point +is that the listed equations are satisfied by ids. tag_type = label % num_tag_type chunk_type = label / num_tag_type -where `num_tag_type` is the num of tag types in the tagging scheme, `num_chunk_type` +where `num_tag_type` is the num of tag types in the tagging scheme, `num_chunk_type` is the num of chunk types, and `tag_type` get its value from the following table. Scheme Begin Inside End Single @@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ is the num of chunk types, and `tag_type` get its value from the following table IOE - 0 1 - IOBES 0 1 2 3 -Still use NER as example, assuming the tagging scheme is IOB while chunk types are ORG, +Still use NER as example, assuming the tagging scheme is IOB while chunk types are ORG, PER and LOC. To satisfy the above equations, the label map can be like this: B-ORG 0 @@ -126,9 +127,9 @@ PER and LOC. To satisfy the above equations, the label map can be like this: I-LOC 5 O 6 -It’s not hard to verify the equations noting that the num of chunk types -is 3 and the num of tag types in IOB scheme is 2. For example, the label -id of I-LOC is 5, the tag type id of I-LOC is 1, and the chunk type id of +It’s not hard to verify the equations noting that the num of chunk types +is 3 and the num of tag types in IOB scheme is 2. For example, the label +id of I-LOC is 5, the tag type id of I-LOC is 1, and the chunk type id of I-LOC is 2, which consistent with the results from the equations. )DOC"); }