New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Standardize naming of ServiceControl Management Utility across all components #833
Comments
@adamralph good point I'm more in favour of dropping "utility" off the end and just calling it ServiceControl Management. |
👍 to drop "utility" |
"ServiceControl Management" sounds good to me. |
Note - Seperate issue raised for the PI change |
👍 thanks @gbiellem BTW - there are plenty of instances of "ServiceControl Managment Utility" in docs: https://github.com/Particular/docs.particular.net/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=utility&type=Code |
@adamralph Yeah I know - Already working on a docs PR :) |
@gbiellem awesome! |
There seem to be several flavours of naming for the ServiceControl Management Utility (screenshots below).
In summary:
Would it be possible to align these on ServiceControl Management Utility?
With our current level of concurrency and the RavenDB PUT mechanics, duplicate error messages can trip the circuit breaker and cause ServiceControl to crash.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: