Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update BeaconState to 0.1 spec #235

Closed
13 tasks done
benjaminion opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed
13 tasks done

Update BeaconState to 0.1 spec #235

benjaminion opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@benjaminion
Copy link
Contributor

benjaminion commented Feb 4, 2019

There have been a bunch of changes to BeaconState that it would be worth incorporating before tackling #233.

To meet the 0.1 spec, we need the following changes to the BeaconState variables.

@benjaminion benjaminion changed the title Update BeaconState to latest spec Update BeaconState to 0.1 spec Feb 4, 2019
benjaminion added a commit to benjaminion/teku that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2019
Brings into line with 0.1 spec.
Part of addressing Consensys#235.
benjaminion added a commit to benjaminion/teku that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2019
And rename `ForkData` class to `Fork`.
Brings code into line with 0.1 spec, and addresses part of Consensys#235.
benjaminion added a commit to benjaminion/teku that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2019
And rename `ForkData` class to `Fork`.
Brings code into line with 0.1 spec, and addresses part of Consensys#235.
@benjaminion benjaminion self-assigned this Feb 4, 2019
@benjaminion benjaminion added the in progress 🚧 This issue or pull request is in progress label Feb 4, 2019
benjaminion added a commit to benjaminion/teku that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2019
Brings into line with 1.0 spec.
Addresses part of Consensys#235.
benjaminion added a commit to benjaminion/teku that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2019
@benjaminion benjaminion added the blocked by another PR/issue 💔 This issue or pull request is blocked by another label Feb 4, 2019
jrhea pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
Brings into line with 0.1 spec.
Part of addressing #235.
jrhea pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
And rename `ForkData` class to `Fork`.
Brings code into line with 0.1 spec, and addresses part of #235.
jrhea pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
jrhea pushed a commit to benjaminion/teku that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
Brings into line with 1.0 spec.
Addresses part of Consensys#235.
jrhea pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
* Rename `latest_penalized_exit_balances`

Brings into line with 1.0 spec.
Addresses part of #235.

* rebase from master
benjaminion added a commit to benjaminion/teku that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
Implements ethereum/consensus-specs#525
Addresses some of Consensys#235

Note that some of the BeaconStateTests still need fixing up.
jrhea pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
Implements ethereum/consensus-specs#525
Addresses some of #235

Note that some of the BeaconStateTests still need fixing up.
@cemozerr cemozerr closed this as completed Feb 8, 2019
dangerousfood pushed a commit to dangerousfood/artemis that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2019
Brings into line with 0.1 spec.
Part of addressing Consensys#235.
dangerousfood pushed a commit to dangerousfood/artemis that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2019
And rename `ForkData` class to `Fork`.
Brings code into line with 0.1 spec, and addresses part of Consensys#235.
dangerousfood pushed a commit to dangerousfood/artemis that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2019
dangerousfood pushed a commit to dangerousfood/artemis that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2019
* Rename `latest_penalized_exit_balances`

Brings into line with 1.0 spec.
Addresses part of Consensys#235.

* rebase from master
dangerousfood pushed a commit to dangerousfood/artemis that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2019
Implements ethereum/consensus-specs#525
Addresses some of Consensys#235

Note that some of the BeaconStateTests still need fixing up.
@schroedingerscode schroedingerscode removed in progress 🚧 This issue or pull request is in progress blocked by another PR/issue 💔 This issue or pull request is blocked by another labels Feb 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants