Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"we can't really punish people for being the first to encounter a bug" <-- is this true if the card is also marked as a bug -- think about it and agree a rule #1537

Closed
vorpal-buildbot opened this issue Nov 5, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

"we can't really punish people for being the first to encounter a bug" <-- is this true if the card is also marked as a bug -- think about it and agree a rule #1537

vorpal-buildbot opened this issue Nov 5, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@vorpal-buildbot
Copy link
Contributor

Reported on Discord by bakert#2193
@silasary
Copy link
Member

silasary commented Nov 6, 2017

If it is a known bug, then they are not the first to encounter it.

If the card has a bug other than the one encountered, (Scythe of the Wretched), or the bug has changed the way it occurs (see the mess with PennyDreadfulMTG/modo-bugs#50 for example), it's a new bug, and should be treated accordingly.

@bakert
Copy link
Member

bakert commented Nov 6, 2017

ok cool. that's what i ruled in the heat of the moment so I'm good to close this.

@bakert bakert closed this as completed Nov 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@bakert @silasary @vorpal-buildbot