Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upModel hierarchy within subject hierarchy #4
Comments
cpinter
added
the
enhancement
label
Oct 30, 2018
cpinter
self-assigned this
Oct 30, 2018
added a commit
to cpinter/Slicer
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2018
pushed a commit
to Slicer/Slicer
that referenced
this issue
Nov 26, 2018
pushed a commit
to Slicer/Slicer
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2018
pushed a commit
to Slicer/Slicer
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@lassoan I finished all items in this ticket. I think we are now ready to replace the model hierarchy to subject hierarchy in the Models module. |
pushed a commit
to Slicer/Slicer
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Pull request for replacing model hierarchy with subject hierarchy in the Models module: This PR enables managing atlases in Slicer accoridng to the needs defined by the OpenAnatomy project. Expected integration is after the release of Slicer 4.10.1. |
added a commit
to Slicer/Slicer
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2019
added a commit
to Slicer/Slicer
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2019
added a commit
to Slicer/Slicer
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2019
added a commit
to Slicer/Slicer
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
cpinter commentedOct 30, 2018
•
edited
In order to label the existing atlases in Slicer properly, we need a way to assign standard terminologies to models in a hierarchy. Instead of fixing the current model hierarchy (which is quite buggy and that's part of the reason SH is not based on the original MRML scene model), we can achieve this within subject hierarchy: