-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 567
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs on destructors are inaccurate #14083
Comments
From @FGasperCreated by @FGasperhttp://perldoc.perl.org/perlobj.html#Destructors The above describes perl 5.12's behavior of populating $@ on a die() This behavior has not been the case since 5.14; as of 5.14, $@ is not Perl Info
|
From @FGasperExample script that demonstrates the issue: ========================== use strict; package Finally; sub new { return bless [$todo_cr], $class; sub DESTROY { #---------------------------------------------------------------------- package main; use strict; print "Perl: eval { print "err in: $@"; print "err out: $@"; ======================= On 9/10/14 2:21 PM, perlbug-followup@perl.org wrote:
|
From @jkeenanOn Wed Sep 10 12:21:53 2014, felipe@felipegasper.com wrote:
Other porters: Is the OP's assertion that these docs are out-of-date correct? Felipe: Would you be able to submit a patch pulled against blead? Thank you very much. -- |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @FGasperOn 9/10/14 8:24 PM, James E Keenan via RT wrote:
I can submit, sure … do you mean in this RT, or via GitHub? -F |
From victor@vsespb.ruduplicate https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=121761 2014-09-12 20:31 GMT+04:00 Felipe Gasper <felipe@felipegasper.com>:
|
From @LeontOn Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Felipe Gasper <felipe@felipegasper.com>
RT is our bugtracker, so please post them here. Leon |
From @jkeenanOn Fri Sep 12 09:31:32 2014, felipe@felipegasper.com wrote:
RT. As an attachment either via the RT web site https://rt.perl.org or by attachment to response to perl5-porters mailing list. -- |
From @FGasperOn 12 Sep 2014 5:54 PM, James E Keenan via RT wrote:
A post earlier indicated that this RT is a dupe. The referent RT seems -F |
From zefram@fysh.orgFixed in commit addf67e. -zefram |
@iabyn - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#122753 (status was 'resolved')
Searchable as RT122753$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: