Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
CPAN user bootstrap of cpanminus fails on CENTOS #14704
Created by firstname.lastname@example.org
This is a bug report for perl from email@example.com,
curl -s -L http://cpanmin.us | perl - App::cpanminus -l ~/.perl5
per the cpanmius documentation, and it failed with this error on a base
--> Working on ExtUtils::Manifest
As a workaround, installing the system package for CPAN via "yum install
On Thu May 14 10:50:18 2015, ajs wrote:
perl 5.10 is no longer supported.
Your perl doesn't seem to have any version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker installed,
If cpanminus claims to support 5.10 you might want to follow it up with them.
On 05/14/2015 08:26 PM, Tony Cook via RT wrote:
Yes, the redhat fellas split perl in parts for some reason for
On 2015-05-15, Tony Cook via RT <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
The log reads: ExtUtils-Manifest declares dependency on
(1) This is a bug in ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.04 distribution.
(2) This effectively creates a build cycle preventing from
If you need ExtUtils::Manifest module, you can install it with "yum
Tell your superuser you need all Perl core modules. This can be achieved
The reason for splitting the packages is that not everybody wants all
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Petr Pisar <email@example.com> wrote:
ExtUtils::MakeMaker bundles its dependencies specifically for this kind of
This is legitimate, but the "perl" package being the minimalistic one
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Leon Timmermans <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
And isn't this a violation of the perl licencing agreement?
On Fri, 15 May 2015 13:10:31 -0700
Why? Where do you see a limitation that prevents doing that (assuming the source
Note: I am not a lawyer (IANAL).
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
<rindolf> preaction: every mighty Klingon warrior uses Vim.
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
Shlomi Fish wrote:
They still have to rename their language to "Hural" since to call it
* bulk88 <email@example.com> [2015-05-16T05:01:27]
I'm not sure whether bulk88 is joking. We're not going to do that.
Roughly once every two years we say that we want to standardize what may or may