Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Re: [LONG] Possible utf8 implementation #624

Closed
p5pRT opened this issue Sep 20, 1999 · 2 comments
Closed

Re: [LONG] Possible utf8 implementation #624

p5pRT opened this issue Sep 20, 1999 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation

Comments

@p5pRT
Copy link

p5pRT commented Sep 20, 1999

Migrated from rt.perl.org#1489 (status was 'resolved')

Searchable as RT1489$
@p5pRT
Copy link
Author

p5pRT commented Sep 20, 1999

From The RT System itself

die() messages are targeted at human consumption. It is OK to DWIM in
this situation. Most other usages of I/O are for consumption by other
agents. And I know no other agents (except possibly some non-DOSISH
filesystems) which will happily survive \x-mutiliated data.

But of course, eventually each I/O channel should be able to specify
(one way or another) a "fallback" mechanism for out-of-range errors.

Ilya

@p5pRT
Copy link
Author

p5pRT commented Apr 22, 2003

@iabyn - Status changed from 'stalled' to 'resolved'

@p5pRT p5pRT closed this as completed Apr 22, 2003
@p5pRT p5pRT mentioned this issue Oct 19, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@p5pRT