Example syntax doesn't play with SQL::Abstract

[SPodjasek]

You get errors like: [SQL::Abstract::_assert_bindval_matches_bindtype] Fatal: bindtype 'columns' selected, you need to pass: [column_name => bind_value]. Going through their documentation it should be written like in this commit.

[dbsrgits-sync]

Sebastian Podjasek notifications@github.com writes:

You get errors like:
[SQL::Abstract::_assert_bindval_matches_bindtype] Fatal: bindtype 'columns' selected, you need to pass: [column_name => bind_value]. Going through their documentation it should be written
like in this commit.

Which version of DBIx::Class are you using? The example syntax has been
valid since version v0.08250.

https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/DBIx-Class#L214

DBIx::Class provides shortcuts for several common cases, above and
beyond what SQL::Abstract does. See the table at the end of the DBIC
BIND VALUES section:

https://metacpan.org/pod/DBIx::Class::ResultSet#DBIC-BIND-VALUES

• Twitter seems more influential [than blogs] in the 'gets reported in
  the mainstream press' sense at least. - Matt McLeod
• That'd be because the content of a tweet is easier to condense down
  to a mainstream media article. - Calle Dybedahl

[SPodjasek]

Should have checked that on start. It was rather old machine that I've encountered this issue - version 0.08127, no possibilities to update so we'll have to stick with SQL::Abstract syntax for compatibility in here.

Sorry for bothering.