New Components - pdf_app_net #14406
New Components - pdf_app_net #14406
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new modules for PDF manipulation within the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
components/pdf_app_net/actions/compress-pdf/compress-pdf.mjs (1)
3-8: Consider version management strategy.While the metadata is well-structured, consider:
- The version number (0.0.1) indicates this is the initial implementation. Ensure you have a versioning strategy in place for future updates.
- The documentation link is hardcoded. Consider moving external URLs to a configuration file for easier maintenance.
components/pdf_app_net/actions/image-to-pdf/image-to-pdf.mjs (2)
3-8: LGTM! Consider adding version changelog.The module metadata is well-structured with a clear key, name, and documentation link.
Consider adding a CHANGELOG.md file to track version changes, starting with:
# Changelog ## [0.0.1] - 2024-10 ### Added - Initial release - Image to PDF conversion functionality
1-37: Security Advisory: Add rate limiting and URL sanitization.Since this component processes external URLs and makes API calls, consider these security improvements:
- Implement rate limiting to prevent abuse
- Add URL sanitization to prevent SSRF attacks
- Consider adding allowed domains list for imageUrl
Would you like me to provide an implementation for these security measures?
components/pdf_app_net/actions/split-pdf/split-pdf.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description.The module structure is well-organized with appropriate metadata. The description includes a helpful link to the documentation.
Consider adding example usage or expected output format to the description:
- description: "Split a PDF into multiple PDFs containing the specified number of pages. [See the documentation](https://pdf-app.net/apidocumentation)", + description: "Split a PDF into multiple PDFs containing the specified number of pages. Output files will be named {filename}_1.pdf, {filename}_2.pdf, etc. [See the documentation](https://pdf-app.net/apidocumentation)",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- components/pdf_app_net/actions/compress-pdf/compress-pdf.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/pdf_app_net/actions/image-to-pdf/image-to-pdf.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/pdf_app_net/actions/split-pdf/split-pdf.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/pdf_app_net/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/pdf_app_net/pdf_app_net.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/pdf_app_net/package.json (3)
12-14: LGTM: Public access configuration is correct.The
"access": "public"setting is appropriate for a publicly available Pipedream component.
3-3: Verify semver compliance for version bump.The version bump to 0.1.0 appears appropriate for a new feature release. However, let's verify this is the first stable release of these components.
#!/bin/bash # Check if this is indeed a new component # Look for previous versions or tags # Check git history for this package.json git log --follow --pretty=format:"%H %s" components/pdf_app_net/package.json # Check for any existing tags for this component git tag -l "@pipedream/pdf_app_net@*"
15-17: Verify platform dependency compatibility.The dependency on @pipedream/platform@^3.0.3 is correctly specified. However, we should verify this version is compatible with the new PDF manipulation features being added.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about PDF-related components and their platform usage to make a more informed decision.
Let me generate the final response based on the information gathered.
Platform dependency version is consistent with modern PDF components
The version
@pipedream/platform@^3.0.3is appropriate for the pdf_app_net component. This is evidenced by:
- Most modern PDF-related components (pdfmonkey, pdf_app_net) use the same version ^3.0.3
- Other components with PDF capabilities (pdffiller) use compatible versions (^3.0.0)
- Only legacy components (pdf_co: ^0.10.0, pdf_charts: ^1.6.3) use older versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if other PDF-related components use the same platform version rg -g "package.json" '"@pipedream/platform":\s*"\^3.0.3"' components/Length of output: 3211
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for PDF-related components and their platform versions rg -g "package.json" -B2 -A2 '"@pipedream/platform"' components/pdf* # Check if there are any specific PDF-related dependencies or features in these components fd . components/pdf -e js -e ts --exec rg -l "pdf|PDF"Length of output: 1694
components/pdf_app_net/actions/compress-pdf/compress-pdf.mjs (1)
1-1: Verify the imported module interface.The import statement looks correct, but let's verify the existence and interface of the imported module.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the module's interface since the previous pattern matching didn't show the complete picture.
I can now generate the final response since I have verified the module's interface and its implementation.
Import statement is correct and module interface is properly implemented
The imported module exists at the correct location and provides the expected
compressPdfmethod along with other PDF manipulation methods. The module is well-structured with:
- Proper type and app definitions
- Common prop definitions for file operations
- Secure API request handling with authentication
- Implementation of the required
compressPdfmethod🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the imported module exists and exports the expected interface echo "Checking for the imported module..." fd "pdf_app_net.app.mjs$" echo "Checking the module's interface..." ast-grep --pattern 'export default { $$$ compressPdf($$$) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the content of the module file echo "Checking the content of pdf_app_net.app.mjs:" cat components/pdf_app_net/pdf_app_net.app.mjs # Also check if there are any other files importing this module echo -e "\nChecking other files importing this module:" rg "from.*pdf_app_net\.app" --type jsLength of output: 1288
components/pdf_app_net/actions/image-to-pdf/image-to-pdf.mjs (1)
23-36:⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling and API request structure.
The run method needs better error handling and could be optimized.
Apply these improvements:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.pdfApp.imageToPdf({ $, data: { - imageUrls: [ - this.imageUrl, - ], + imageUrl: this.imageUrl, async: false, fileName: this.fileName, + timeout: 30000, // 30 second timeout for sync operations }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully converted image to PDF File"); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to convert image to PDF: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },Let's verify the API documentation for the correct request structure:
components/pdf_app_net/pdf_app_net.app.mjs (2)
1-13: LGTM! Well-structured app definition and prop.The import statement, app definition, and prop definition follow best practices with proper documentation.
18-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error handling and verify authorization format.
A few suggestions for improvement:
- The method should include explicit error handling
- Verify if the API requires "Bearer" prefix in the Authorization header
Consider adding error handling:
_makeRequest({ $ = this, path, ...opts }) { - return axios($, { + try { + return axios($, { method: "POST", url: `${this._baseUrl()}${path}`, headers: { - "Authorization": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, + "Authorization": `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`, }, ...opts, }); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`PDF-APP.NET API request failed: ${error.message}`); + } },components/pdf_app_net/actions/split-pdf/split-pdf.mjs (1)
29-37: Verify API parameters against documentation.Please verify that all required parameters are being passed according to the pdf-app.net API documentation. Specifically:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to find API usage patterns and documentation.
Let me try one more search to find any additional files related to the split PDF functionality.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
API parameters appear to be correctly implemented
The implementation matches the expected integration pattern and includes all necessary parameters for the PDF App API:
- The base URL and authentication are properly handled in the app file
- The split PDF endpoint is correctly implemented with required parameters:
fileUrl: URL of the PDF to splitpagesPerSplit: Number of pages per split filefileName: Optional parameter as documentedasync: Control parameter for synchronous/asynchronous processingThe implementation follows the same pattern as other PDF App endpoints (compress, image to PDF) and includes a link to the official API documentation in the description.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other pdf_app_net API calls to compare parameter consistency rg -A 5 'this\.pdfApp\.' --type jsLength of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for PDF App related files and their content fd -e mjs -e js pdf_app --exec cat {} # Also check for any README or documentation files fd -e md pdf_app --exec cat {}Length of output: 1074
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the split-pdf action implementation and any related files fd split-pdf --exec cat {} # Also search for any usage of splitPdf method rg -A 5 'splitPdf' --type js --type mjsLength of output: 1327
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- components/pdf_app_net/actions/split-pdf/split-pdf.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/pdf_app_net/actions/split-pdf/split-pdf.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM! Import statement is clean and follows best practices.
3-8: LGTM! Action metadata is well-structured and documented.The metadata provides clear identification and documentation for the action.
9-27: Input validation improvements needed.The previous review comment about adding input validation is still valid and should be addressed.
28-40: Error handling improvements needed.The previous review comment about error handling and success message improvements is still valid and should be addressed.
* new components * pnpm-lock.yaml * fix summary
Resolves #13962
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
These updates significantly improve the PDF manipulation capabilities of the application.