Skip to content

Conversation

@michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Jul 1, 2025

Resolves #17277

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added an optional setting to control whether created documents include a watermark (preview mode).
  • Chores

    • Updated internal package and dependency versions.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 1, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 1, 2025 4:04pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 1, 2025 4:04pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 1, 2025 4:04pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new optional preview property to the Documint create-document action, allowing users to control whether documents are created with or without a watermark. The property defaults to true. The action and package versions are incremented, and a dependency is updated in the package configuration.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
components/documint/actions/create-document/create-document.mjs Added optional preview prop (default true); used this.preview for the API param; updated summary message; incremented action version.
components/documint/package.json Bumped package version to 0.1.1; updated @pipedream/platform dependency to ^3.1.0.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Action
    participant DocumintAPI

    User->>Action: Trigger create-document with preview (true/false)
    Action->>DocumintAPI: POST createDocument (preview: true/false)
    DocumintAPI-->>Action: Return document response
    Action-->>User: Output document ID and info
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Make "preview" parameter settable in the UI instead of hardcoded (Issue #17277)
Allow creation of documents without watermark by controlling "preview" param (Issue #17277)

Poem

A toggle for preview, now settable and bright,
No more watermarks haunting your sight!
With a hop and a leap, our docs are anew—
Choose watermark or not, the choice is with you.
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

components/documint/actions/create-document/create-document.mjs

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at Object.getPackageJSONURL (node:internal/modules/package_json_reader:255:9)
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:767:81)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:853:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:983:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:801:12)
at #cachedDefaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:725:25)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:708:38)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJobForImport (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:309:38)
at #link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:202:49)


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df8a3b7 and eb78600.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/documint/actions/create-document/create-document.mjs (3 hunks)
  • components/documint/package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
components/documint/package.json (1)
Learnt from: jcortes
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14935
File: components/sailpoint/package.json:15-18
Timestamp: 2024-12-12T19:23:09.039Z
Learning: When developing Pipedream components, do not add built-in Node.js modules like `fs` to `package.json` dependencies, as they are native modules provided by the Node.js runtime.
components/documint/actions/create-document/create-document.mjs (3)
Learnt from: jcortes
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14467
File: components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs:4-6
Timestamp: 2024-10-30T15:24:39.294Z
Learning: In `components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs`, the action name should be "Create Account" instead of "Create Memory".
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T18:11:59.822Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:38.240Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (6)
components/documint/package.json (2)

3-3: LGTM: Version increment is appropriate.

The patch version increment from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1 is appropriate for adding a new optional property without breaking existing functionality.


16-16: Confirm API compatibility when bumping to @pipedream/platform v3

File: components/documint/package.json
Lines: 16

-   "@pipedream/platform": "^1.5.1"
+   "@pipedream/platform": "^3.1.0"

I didn’t find any in-repo migration docs for the v3.x release, and while most other components have already moved to 3.x, this major version jump may include breaking changes. Please:

  • Run your component’s unit/integration tests against v3.1.0 to catch any runtime or signature mismatches.
  • Review Pipedream’s official v3 migration guide (https://pipedream.com/docs/migration) for API changes between v1.x and v3.x.
  • Double-check that all handlers, hooks, and exported function signatures in components/documint remain compatible with the new platform APIs.
components/documint/actions/create-document/create-document.mjs (4)

5-5: LGTM: Version increment is appropriate.

The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2 is appropriate for adding a new optional feature.


22-28: Well-implemented preview property.

The new preview property is well-designed:

  • Boolean type is appropriate for watermark control
  • Default value of true maintains backward compatibility
  • Optional flag prevents breaking existing implementations
  • Clear description explains the watermark behavior

40-40: LGTM: Dynamic preview parameter implementation.

The change from hardcoded preview: true to this.preview correctly implements the dynamic watermark control feature as intended.


48-48: Confirm Documint API uses _id for document identifiers
We ran a search across all components/documint/actions files for response.id and response._id and only found the following usage in the create-document action. Please verify against the Documint API documentation or by testing that the response object indeed provides an _id field (and not id) before shipping this update.

• components/documint/actions/create-document/create-document.mjs (around line 48)

$.export("$summary", `Successfully created document with ID \`${response._id}\``);
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@michelle0927 michelle0927 merged commit 5886ddd into master Jul 2, 2025
11 checks passed
@michelle0927 michelle0927 deleted the issue-17277 branch July 2, 2025 14:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documint

3 participants