Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new is_a children of collective plant structure #71

Closed
planteome-user opened this Issue Mar 17, 2010 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@planteome-user
Copy link

planteome-user commented Mar 17, 2010

The following terms had no is_a parent, so I made them children of collective plant structure:
andreocium
calyx
corolla
epicalyx
flower- see [plant-ontology-po-term-requests:#160]
gynoecium
inflorescence
infructescence
involucre
perianth
spikelet

Reported by: rlwalls2008

Original Ticket: obo/plant-ontology-po-term-requests/71

@planteome-user

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

planteome-user commented Apr 5, 2010

Everyone agreed that these terms should be children of collective plant structure and that we will come back and work on the definitions at a future date. So I am closing this item.

Original comment by: cooperl09

@planteome-user

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

planteome-user commented May 5, 2010

The following terms were made is_a children of collective phyllome structure:
andreocium, calyx, corolla, epicalyx, gynoecium, perianth

  • involucre should also be a children of collective phyllome structure

Original comment by: cooperl09

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.