Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check if the boost library date_time can be replaced #5478

Closed
mvieth opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Check if the boost library date_time can be replaced #5478

mvieth opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
good first issue Skills/areas of expertise needed to tackle the issue

Comments

@mvieth
Copy link
Member

mvieth commented Oct 18, 2022

    > i thought there is an opportunity to get rid of date_time incluclusion, but there's no easy way to do it

I think date_time is mostly needed for to_iso_string and local_time, to create a string representing the current time (for filenames etc), right? Maybe std::strftime or std::put_time can replace that?

Originally posted by @mvieth in #5204 (comment)

We are using some functions from boost's date_time library. It would be great if we can replace some or even all of them with functions from the standard library. If we don't need date_time any more, we can remove it as a dependency.

@mvieth mvieth added the good first issue Skills/areas of expertise needed to tackle the issue label Oct 18, 2022
@mvieth
Copy link
Member Author

mvieth commented Feb 21, 2023

Done by #5596

@mvieth mvieth closed this as completed Feb 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Skills/areas of expertise needed to tackle the issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant